🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:17:32 -0400, "Mark Probert"
<mark_probertREMOVEGARBAGE@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Monte" <montep@email.com> wrote in message
>news:3d373555.75039621@news.ev1.net...
>> On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:19:07 -0400, "Mark Probert"
>> <CuriousGeorge@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Monte" <montep@email.com> wrote in message
>> >news:3d36d5d0.50586078@news.ev1.net...
>> >> http://www.msnbc.com/news/782180.asp
>> >>
>> >> Read the WHOLE story.  Why did Harvey Pitt the SEC chairman end the
>> >> investigation last year?
>> >
>> >I am curious...
>> >
>> >When did the investigation end?
>> >
>> >George..
>> >
>> Well George, as I said in the very FIRST sentence...READ THE WHOLE
>> STORY!  The portion germane to your question is about midway or so.
>> sheeesh
>
>I did read the story the the link refers to. I seemed to have missed it the
>seven or eight times that I read it.
>
>How about pretending that I am stupid and a clueless moron and you are a
>real nice guy who wants to lead me to this information.
>
>So, when did the SEC drop the investigation?
>
>Thanks.
>

As the story cited in the URL said it was an on-going investigation
into the exact same allegations spanning 3-4 yrs.  Last summer-fall it
closed the investigation, no reason was given in the story.  The point
is that now it is up to the same man who shut down the first
investigation, Pitt, to now open another investigating the exact same
type of charges.  

Will he do it?  Will he simply investigate it to death in someones out
basket and then quietly kill it like the first?


Monte
"Today's public figures can no longer write their own speeches or books,
 and there is some evidence that they can't read them either." ---Gore Vidal