🚀 go-pugleaf

Monte <montep@about.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:28:56 +0000 (UTC), "Fyrdraca Islendingur"
> <fyrdraca@islendingur.com> wrote:
>>: > So now tell me it is unreasonable to critisize
>>: one single aspect of Islam, the allowing of
>>: terrorists to go unchecked?
>>
>>Yes.  For the very simple reason that Islam DOES NOT provide for
>>"allowing of terrorists to go unchecked."

> Now the question to you is this. Give a specific instance of when an
> Islamic cleric or representative of an Islamic law nation ever
> condemned and or prosecuted another Muslim for terrorists acts against
> a non-Muslim person or nation.


Condemnation of the recent act has been universal, with the exception
of Iraq.  Hell, even the Taliban condemned the attack.

I also gave several examples of Islamic nations prosecuting terrorists
in an earlier posting.  Those examples from the previous posting:
Conspirators for the bombing of the USS Cole are in prison in Yemen.
Many terrorists were in jail in the Palestinian territories (and put
there by Palestinian authorities) before they were broken out of jail
in the recent uprising.  The Libyan government handed over the PanAm
bombers for prosecution.

Here's a new example for you:  A group of Saudis carried out a
terrorist bombing that killed 4 Americans and an Indian.  The Saudis
arrested them, convicted them, and beheaded them.  Is that
"prosecution" enough for you?

-- 
Steve Tate --- srt[At]cs.unt.edu | Gratuitously stolen quote:
Dept. of Computer Sciences       | "The box said 'Requires Windows 95, NT, 
University of North Texas        |  or better,' so I installed Linux."
Denton, TX  76201                |