🚀 go-pugleaf

On 26 Nov 2000 00:22:17 GMT, Merlin Dorfman <dorfman@rahul.net> wrote:

>     But Florida (and Texas) law require that a ballot be counted
>if it is clear what the voter's intent was.  Nobody is trying to
>read the voters' minds, just count a ballot when the intent is
>clear but the machine rejected it.

Bullshit, Merlin.

If the voter does his or her job correctly, the machine will count
their vote correctly; every time.

Read on for the liberal bias and the blatant attempt by the Gore
people to steal this election:

"As Broward County elections officials pressed to finish their review
of disputed presidential ballots, transcripts of the canvassing board
recount sessions show member Suzanne Gunzburger, a Democrat and an
active contributor to the Democratic National Committee, blatantly
hunting for more Gore votes!"

You can find this story at Drudge's site. I have heard this same type
of statements from other sources.

http://www.drudgereport.com/bro.htm

The liberals are definitely trying to steal this election. I'm
considering another "Blazing Saddles" analysis of this Florida recount
fiasco. This re-count should not be occurring in the counties that are
being re-counted. Algore, Jr. won these counties. Why did he need a
re-count there? I may have to do some research and see if the winner
in a county can legally ask for a re-count in that county.

Oh, FYI........ NEVER question Toddh's sources. I've learned that the
hard way.

Mike Smith