🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <gqcna6lrq08elkrp9bsbsc8639pbnrhg3i@4ax.com>,
Lisa mcVay-Henske  <LisaMcVay-Henske@anti.KenMcVay.com> wrote:

Oh, look! There's William Grosvenor's favorite
newsreader again!

Updated Grosvenor Legal Documents & Extortion conviction: 
http://William-Grosvenor.info

William Grosvenor is a convicted extortionist who
devotes his time to spreading hatred and defamation.

Grosvenor recently complied with a court order to pay a 
$50,000 libel award and costs in excess of $30,000 
resulting from his penchant for defamation,
libel, assault and extortion.

He is, above all, monumentally stupid.

Grosvenor now lives in exile, a complete disgrace.

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html

Defamation

[52]      In Botiuk v. Toronto Free Press Publications
Ltd., 1995 CanLII 60 (S.C.C.), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 3
(S.C.C.), Cory J. said, at para. 62,

   [A] publication which tends to lower a person in the
estimation of right-thinking members of society, or to
expose a person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, is
defamatory and will attract liability.What is
defamatory may be determined from the ordinary meaning
of the published words themselves or from the
surrounding circumstances. 
                         
[53]      The tort of defamation consists of the two
torts of libel and slander.  The law of libel and
slander protects an individual.s reputation.  Libel is
any publication of defamatory material.  The law
presumes that the words are false unless and until the
defendant proves the contrary.  In order to succeed in
his defamatory action, the plaintiff must establish
each of the following three elements on a balance of
probabilities:  (1) the words are defamatory; (2) the
words are published; (3) the plaintiff is the person
defamed: Rainaldi, Remedies in Tort, looseleaf
(Carswell, 2006), at pp. 6-20.

[54]      With respect to the first element, the
Postings on the various websites and with the various
website groups are clearly defamatory according to
their ordinary meaning.  They are calculated to be
personally and professionally insulting and demeaning.
They refer to the plaintiff as a dishonest man, liar,
scumbag, pimp and disgusting maggot, to name a few.
They falsely allege that the plaintiff is part of
organized crime and financed by .mobs..  They falsely
allege that the plaintiff was convicted of child
molestation.  They attack the plaintiff.s credibility
and reputation as a lawyer.  They significantly
discredit his personal and professional reputation and
they do so over and over again.  They heap hatred,
contempt and ridicule on the plaintiff and by their
volume and wide dissemination, they seriously expose
the plaintiff to hatred, contempt and ridicule from
others.  As the plaintiff testified at trial, to be
falsely alleged to be a pedophile convicted of sexual
assault against a young person is particularly hurtful.

[55]      With respect to the second element, I have no
difficulty concluding that the defamatory words are
published.  The Internet is a means of publication like
no other, given its ability to instantaneously send
words throughout the world to the millions who have
access to computers.  The defendant has caused
defamatory words to be communicated to others by the
Postings and each time he has re-posted the same
defamatory words in the Postings, he has created a new
publishing of these words.

[56]      I also have no difficulty concluding that the
third element has been established, in that the
plaintiff was clearly the person being defamed.  The
defendant mentioned the plaintiff.s name in all of the
Fourteen Postings referred to above.  In some of the
Postings, the defendant included links to a picture of
the plaintiff.

[57]      It is for these reasons I conclude that the
defendant.s Postings have defamed the plaintiff.

-- 
"The Nizkor website (secretly financed by the ADL and other Jewish front
organizations) is behind it." (David Irving, whining about Google's 
reminder of his disgrace.) The facts:
http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/i/irving-david/judgment-00-00.html