🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: tx.general
Article #2595

State property tax proposal

#2595
From: Igor Etter
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:13
117 lines
5878 bytes
I've received numerous e-mails about this proposed tax.  Whether it is a tax 
or not could be argued, but unless the wording is changed to ASSESSING the 
tax from TAXING my home, I could not vote for it.
Here are some fragments of the e-mails I've received and my responses:

Interesting.  I will be voting against this.



Thanks,

XXXX



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This electronic mail transmission has been sent by 
a law firm.  It may contain information that is confidential, privileged, 
proprietary, or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized 
to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message, or any part of it, 
or any attachments.  If you have received this message in error, please 
delete this message and any attachments from your system without reading the 
content and notify the sender immediately of the inadvertent transmission. 
There is no intent on the part of the sender to waive any privilege, 
including the attorney-client privilege, that may attach to this 
communication.  Thank you for your cooperation.

Treasury Circular 230 Disclosure - To comply with requirements imposed by 
the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any tax advice contained in 
this written communication (including any attachment) is not intended or 
written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of 
avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the person.  If this written 
communication contains any tax advice that is used or referred to in 
connection with the promoting, marketing or recommending of any 
transaction(s) or matter(s), this written communication should be construed 
as written to support the promoting, marketing or recommending of the 
transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed by this written communication, and the 
taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances 
from an independent tax advisor.  No limitation has been imposed by 
Bellinger & DeWolf, L.L.P. on disclosure of the tax treatment or tax 
structure of the transaction(s) or matter(s).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Someone had sent this to me earlier.

I then posted a comment on this propsed law on the internet.  Someone 
responded claiming that the purpose is to prevent the tax being paid based 
on the property's commercial value.  If that is the intent, the proposal 
should be re-worded to state that the property will be ASSESSED (not taxed) 
at its residential value.

There is NO difference in the tax rate for property as far as I know, only 
the appraised values and certain exemptions affect the ad valorem tax.

Years ago there was a 42� per $ 100 state ad valorem tax which was 
eliminated by the legislature.  This proposal might be a way to sneak it 
back in through the back door.



Igor

  ----- Original Message ----- 

  Subject: FW: Texans-We Need to Vote on Nov. 3rd...






  Please pay attention to these propositions before voting on Nov. 3 - refer 
to the link at the bottom.







             We Need to Vote on Nov. 3rd



            Vote NO on State Property Tax.



              Please pass onto your home owner friends......


            On November 3rd, there will be Propositions 1, 2,  and 3 
allowing the State of Texas to start taxing Residential Homeowners.  So if 
you own  a home, and these laws are passed, you will be taxed by the State.
            I received a flyer from the Secretary of State, Hope Andrade, 
listing the Propositions that are up for election in November.  I called to 
question them before sending this message out to my homeowner friends.

            PLEASE VOTE "NO" to Prop. 2 and 3 (HJR 36) unless you want to 
pay taxes to the State also for owning a home.
            Proposition 2:  The proposed amendment would appear on the 
ballot  as follows:  "The constitutional amendment authorizing the 
legislature to provide for the ad valor em taxation of a residence homestead 
solely on the basis of the property's value as a residence homestead".

            Proposition 3:  The proposed amendment would appear on the 
ballot as follows:  The constitutional amendment providing the uniform 
standards and procedures for the appraisal of property for ad valor em tax 
purposes".

              http://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/voter/2009novballotexp.shtml

              Thank  you.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <hb7l7o$959$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!188.40.43.213.MISMATCH!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 9860a1eacd,435311d7bdf30a51,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid9860a1eacd,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!188.40.43.213.MISMATCH!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!not-for-mail
From: "Igor Etter" <Igor@its.invalid>
Newsgroups: tx.general,tx.politics,dfw.politics
Subject: State property tax proposal
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:13:06 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 119
Message-ID: <hb7l7o$959$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 format=flowed;
 charset="iso-8859-1";
 reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.eternal-september.org U2FsdGVkX1/vkyqr72Q54ILXC4RRg52v6E/fTSJc5JJsSxUV8aCSl+33b3JIJ1WL7RvJj5h6WAzr4GFN/v84GYo4hOOJ2vYIw9KKC8pixF0B5eDm1zJVp+4I6/LFKTwNZ7K8Fbo+bOTzvUB9R6WW/w==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@eternal-september.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:13:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18dML/mI6pVUF8Xi+2xDuA4Fn3q9bjOFW0=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4AN47i9f/EF//JyFQ+1uQ34Md5o=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal