🚀 go-pugleaf

"apt" <aptex@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a3932j$16phfj$1@ID-125584.news.dfncis.de...
> "Family Values", are something we try to instill in our children. To
succeed
> or fail do not diminish the intent. The intent is to inject a better set
of
> morals in the world that obviously this world has lost track of. Look at
the
> values that your parents, and their parents dealt with. If you think they
> were no different than the values of today, someone needs to pry the rock
> off your head. This world is not a better place to live than 50 years ago.
> Republican, democrat or Liberal, this world is in trouble. If you don't
> think so, then you obviously are an Atheist, and this discussion is a
waste
> of time.
>
How is it you mix political affiliations with religious beliefs? One doesn't
have to believe in the Almighty to realize that there is trouble in River
City. However, I feel you speak from a white perspective when you look back
at the good old days. From a minorities point of view, I can bet their view
would be somewhat different
>
> "St. Elsewhere" <michaelphillips@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:ShP58.14606$8d1.5858814@news1.rdc1.md.home.com...
> >
> > "Linda & Gary Walker" <lgvwalk@swbell.net> wrote in message
> > news:RJI58.3266$Ly1.1038872724@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Please, when ya'll argue like this, can you preface the
> > > comments with "liberal/democrat" or "conservative/
> > > republican". That way, I can tell just which set of
> > > comments I want to read.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > "Monte" <montep@email.com> wrote in message
> > > news:3c57357a.121198374@news.ev1.net...
> > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:36:41 -0600, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
> > > > >On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:06:03 GMT, montep@email.com (Monte) wrote:
> > > > >>Question? Name the one thing, other than style an class, that
> > > > >>differentiates the Bush clan from the Kennedy clan.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Here ya go, you stupid buffoon.
> > > > >
> > > > >Read all about our President from an avowed liberal's point of view
> > > > >(Bob Woodward).
> > > > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42754-2002Jan26.html
> > > > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46879-2002Jan27.html
> > > > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50529-2002Jan28.html
> > > > >Mike Smith
> > > > >Go see if your Congress person is a lying, anti-American socialist.
> > > > ><http://www.dsausa.org/pc/pc.members.html>.
> > > >
> > > > Well, Mike let me first congratulate you on being the first concrete
> > > > skulled 'christian-conservative-retard' to respond without having
the
> > > > least understanding of what I alluded too.
> > > >
> > > > The BUSHs AND the KENNEDYs are ALIKE except in the one instance.
SEE,
> > > > bubba?  I said that they are both execrable in many ways, excepting
> > > > the 'Family Values' preaching, proselytizing and legislating.  Get
it
> > > > Bubba?  The Bush's presume to know what is best for ALL parents and
> > > > their children.  They presume to the thrown of parentdom, when in
fact
> > > > they suffer the same or higher rates of failure in that arena as any
> > > > other hard working American family.
> > > >
> > > > Now you blithering idiot, go back to praying, kowtowing, and playing
> > > > the apologist for your spitual leaders, they have as much substance
> > > > and devine connections as their retarded followers.  Pray hard you
> > > > fool to the Bush's, the Lays, the reeds, the Falwells, the
Robertsons,
> > > > the Bakkers, the Swaggerts, the born again captains of industry who
> > > > steal your taxes and send your jobs to little short brown people who
> > > > work for half rations of rice.  Yes, pray to all of them and defend
> > > > them, for they will be merciful to you and your family.  They will
> > > > allow their devoted followers to die less lingering deaths than the
> > > > dissenters.
> > > >
> > > > But, in truth if I were you I would pray to come back the next time
as
> > > > something with a brain.
> > > > m
> > >
> >
> > Doing so would lead one to only read the views they identify with, and
not
> > get a balanced view of what the rest of the audience believes. if you
want
> > biased news or posts look for ngs that contain the tags you idenitfy
with.
> > Im sure they exist.
> > >
> >
> >
>
>