🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:17:44 -0600, "apt" <aptex@nospamhotmail.com>
wrote:

>If you DO have a family, and you have raised several children, you would say
>to this "who cares"... We have raised (3) children the same way, (1) is
>basically living on the streets, the other (2) have made a fine upstanding
>life for themselves. No difference in raising. I'm not going to beat myself
>up for how my children turn out, when I know they were raised in a good
>moral atmosphere. Nor will I condemn the Bushes, the Kennedy's or Clintons
>for the black sheep in their families. If you want to talk about Momma and
>Daddy and their cigar habits, or late night swims, then ok. But don't scoff
>people in how their kids turned out till you walked in their shoes.
>
>
>
 The question then becomes, Do you preach about, or advise others how
to raise their children?  Do you hold your own family up as
epitomizing parenting?  

I'll anticipate the answer to both is a resounding no!  Ma Bush and
her litter show no such restraint.  And certainly none of their
rightwing-claiming-to-be-the-ultimate-source-of-things-christian show
any such restraint.

I do not heave bricks through the windows of someone who did their
best and had some failures, but I will drive a bulldozer through the
whole house of those who presume to know the ultimate answer to
parenting and proceed to effect legislation to enforce their
fantasies.

M


>Monte <montep@email.com> wrote in message
>news:3c56ff29.107293439@news.ev1.net...
>> Question? Name the one thing, other than style an class, that
>> differentiates the Bush clan from the Kennedy clan.
>>
>> Answer- The Bush's preach about their superior 'Family Values'.  Well
>> here's another example:
>> http://www.msnbc.com/news/695913.asp
>> Let's see that's three of the girls, and of course although they keep
>> him closeted, there is brother Neil, the convicted felon.
>> Yep, Ol' Ma 'Barker' Bush instilled some fine 'Family Values' in that
>> litter.
>