🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: tx.general
Article #3172

Re: Bikes (was Re: GUN CONTROL)

#3172
From: David L. Cathey
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 1994 02:53
84 lines
4958 bytes
In article <D.Nash-1211941238150001@slip-18-14.ots.utexas.edu>, D.Nash@utexas.edu (Donald L. Nash) writes:
>                                                               My basic
> point remains: bikers don't pay as much toward road construction as
> motorists.

	But they also don't use bicycle traffic to justify building or
improving roads.  They only build roads between two places if there is
sufficient car/truck demands to do so, not cyclists.

> We've already got a gasoline tax that does exactly this.  Bikers don't pay
> that either, but I wouldn't expect them to pay that.

	No, but we do pay sales tax on the extra food we consume.

>>Try not driving in the UT area during rush hour.
> 
> My aren't you Mr. Arrogant!  I work for UT; I drive down here because
> that's how I get to work (walking and biking are out of the question
> because I live too far away).  And since my work hours is pretty much the
> same as everyone else's, I hit the rush hours just like everyone else.

	Hypocrite.  Many people cycle in the UT area because they are
students who many not be able to afford to buy a car, and they have to
attend class (i.e. they are the REASON you have a job).  The bike is their
transportation between home and class.

>>Try letting pedestrians and cyclists have the right of way on campus.  
> 
> Peds do have right of way on campus and I don't contest them for it.  I
> used to be a student down there, so I know what it's like.  But as it has
> already been pointed out here, bikers have the same rights as motorists. 
> "The same" does not mean "more".  Bikers don't have any more ROW than
> motorists, even on campus.

	Very true!

>                             If I'm legally entitled to the ROW over a
> biker, I'll take it with no more hesitation than I would have in taking it
> from another motorist.

	And I would fully expect you to do so.  And I prefer that you take
your ROW as well (Some people grant me ROW when they really have it, and
often I would prefer that they take it).

>                         And the biker is obligated by law to yield if I
> have the ROW, just as a motorist is.

	And I am happy to do so.

> But as long as the law says that bikers have the *same* rights as
> motorists, don't preach to me about giving them more than their due.

	I don't think anyone is asking you to.

> Bikers wouldn't be a problem on campus anyway if they'd just obey the
> traffic laws (most of them don't).  The speed limit on campus is 15 mph,
> about bike speed.  
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>                    Bikers don't hold up traffic when everyone is required
> to go as slow as they do.

	That can greatly depend on the cyclist and other conditions.

>                      UT doesn't have enough parking space as it is.  Your
> suggestion would eliminate even more of it.

	So you should be ENCOURAGING cyclists!  Bikes take much less parking,
which would increase your ability to find parking.

> And besides, I wasn't talking about driving on the campus itself; I meant
> driving in the public streets surrounding the campus.  There are a lot of
> students who live in the areas immediatelly surrounding campus, and many
> of them bike to class.  Most of the streets around campus are narrow and
> the speed limit is generally 30 - 35, quite a bit faster than a bike. 
> Bikers do hold up traffic on these streets.  I speak from experience, I've
> been caught behind them too many times before.

	You mean the students that you are there for?  Getting on your way?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
David L. Cathey		              |Inet: davidc@montagar.com
Montagar Software Concepts            |UUCP: ...!montagar!davidc
P. O. Box 260776                      |Fone: (214)-578-5036
Plano TX  75026-0772                  |http://www.montagar.com/~davidc/
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1994Nov17.215353.19453@montagar.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!cs.utexas.edu!convex!seas.smu.edu!mic!montagar!davidc
References: <39r0m3$h1k@oak.zilker.net> <D.Nash-0911941817290001@bubba.ots.utexas.edu> <D.Nash-1211941238150001@slip-18-14.ots.utexas.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103916,642977eedb6b415e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103916,public
X-Google-Thread: fd714,44a840f94edd3e03
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd714,public
X-Google-Thread: 104ad1,faf138bd852a6ce6
X-Google-Attributes: gid104ad1,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b82c,642977eedb6b415e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b82c,public
X-Google-Thread: f59be,2e27125b926e6893
X-Google-Attributes: gidf59be,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-17 23:04:08 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!cs.utexas.edu!convex!seas.smu.edu!mic!montagar!davidc
From: davidc@montagar.com (David L. Cathey)
Newsgroups: tx.general,dfw.general,tx.guns,tx.politics,austin.general
Subject: Re: Bikes (was Re: GUN CONTROL)
Message-ID: <1994Nov17.215353.19453@montagar.com>
Date: 17 Nov 94 21:53:53 CDT
References: <39r0m3$h1k@oak.zilker.net> <D.Nash-0911941817290001@bubba.ots.utexas.edu>  <D.Nash-1211941238150001@slip-18-14.ots.utexas.edu>
Distribution: tx,dfw
Organization: Montagar Software Concepts, Plano TX
Lines: 84