🚀 go-pugleaf

In <38s00f$t01@crchh518.bnr.ca> tomg@bnr.ca (Tom G) writes: 

>
>
>In article <38rnln$38j@crchh572.bnr.ca>, rnichols@bnr.ca (Robin Nichols) writes:
>> 
>> I've been trying to say this the past couple of days ...
>> anti-gunners will come up with any "example" to try and
>> make their point.  Anything.  Even though it can be beaten
>> down in a New York minute.  Most of us "gun-lovers" are open
>> to change, but not total banishment or restriction.  That's 
>> all they will accept however.
>
>What a stereotype.  You don't really believe this I am sure.
>
>What if one says that all pro-gunners only want TOTALLY unrestricted,
>undocumented access ALL TYPES of guns?  This is about an equal statement
>to yours.
>
>No anti-gunner with common sense honestly believes that you can get rid
>of guns over night.  Many just want restrictions.  Many want to
>pursue the goal of significant control to varying degrees.
>
>Guns can never be completely eliminated.  But many societies have 
>significantly reduced their criminal use by minimizing availability.
>  
>
I think you have way too much free time on you hands, Tom.  Why don't
you get a job.  Or maybe a hobby.  Just do something useful.

VR