🚀 go-pugleaf

>In article <37vlrr$en1@news.utdallas.edu> goyal@utdallas.edu (Mohit K Goyal) writes:
>>From: goyal@utdallas.edu (Mohit K Goyal)
>
>>:      Please describe the "hunting" uses of a Tec-9 or an Uzi.
>>:      Please name one incidence of either one of them being 
>>:    used in a self-defense role.
>>:    PS: if you cannot, that's O.K. The NRA admitted they cannot
>>:    name one, either, and this was on national TV while they were
>>:    trying to defend these guns. The only reason they could name 
>>:    for continued sales of them was that "they COULD be used for 
>>:    hunting". But hunting what, we wonder....


Why does the only legitimate purpose of owning an assault rifle or machine 
gun have to be hunting?  If I ever buy a weapon, I want something like an Uzi 
to protect myself from the evil citizens, police, or government persons.  I 
would never use the weapon on the good citizens, police, or government
persons.  The second amendment did not furnish me the right to hunt.  It
furnished me the right to protect myself from tyranny.