🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: tx.general
Article #4001

Re: Whitehouse defends Lotts Racism!

#4001
From: Monte
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:05
106 lines
6177 bytes
vonroach <vonroach@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:3j5qvucns2aasc80d5rd5ok09qhflr6bd3@4ax.com: 

> On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 22:49:24 -0000, Monte
> <GeeDubya@aol.com> wrote: 
> 
>>Roach also makes a point of saying that he voted in '48,
>>which makes him born in 1927 or earlier.  Roach go take
>>your gingko and prozac cause yer ol' suthrin'sun-baked
>>brain is gasping.  
> 
> I guess you are the one over indulging in pharmaceuticals.
> The French recognized the N. Vietnam rebels in 1946, one
> year after HST became President. American advisors were
> helping the continued resistance of the South Vietnamese
> before and after the French left, even while fighting a
> `police action' in Korea. The election came in 1948 while
> you were still separated in a sperm and egg, even before
> your revised history was written. Your math is as foggy has
> your history. The voting age, after a big row after WW2,
> that soldiers old enough to fight were old enough to vote
> had made the eligible voting age 18 years, Anyone born 
> before 1930 was eligible to vote in the Texas general
> election of 1948. Voting in Harris County was by a large
> paper ballot marking boxes with a pencil. A States Rights
> Party Convention in the Sam Houston Coliseum, in Houston,
> Texas, had nominated Governor Strom Thiurmond to run for
> President, and the main issue in Houston, the Oil Capitol,
> was securing the rights of the States to control the
> exploration for oil that lay beneath their tidelands.

Uh ROACH you senile old bastard.  Since it was a presidential 
election that was the point of discussion, and that happens to 
be a FEDERAL one, then I point out to you the following 
concerning the 26th amnedment......
==========================================
U.S. Constitution: Twenty-Sixth Amendment 
Twenty-Sixth Amendment - Reduction of Voting Age Qualification 

Amendment Text | Annotations   
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are 
eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or 
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of 
age. 

Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this 
article by appropriate legislation. 

Annotations 
The Eighteen-Year-Old Vote 

In extending the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in 1970 1 Congress 
included a provision lowering the age qualification to vote in 
all elections, federal, state, and local, to 18. 2 In a 
divided decision, the Supreme Court held that Congress was 
empowered to lower the age qualification in federal elections, 
but voided the application of the provision in all other 
elections as beyond congressional power. 3 Confronted thus 
with the possibility that they might have to maintain two sets 
of registration books and go to the expense of running 
separate election systems for federal elections and for all 
other elections, the States were receptive to the proposing of 
an Amendment by Congress to establish a minimum age 
qualification at 18 for all elections, and ratified it 
promptly. 4   
========================================

That you may have voted in a federal election in Texas and 
have been under the age of 21 in 1948 does nothing more than 
illustrate the general state of affairs concerning elections 
in the South.


> Offshore drilling was booming. I was born before 1930 and
> was eligible to vote. I'm amazed at the ignorance of
> children these days, who want to view history compiled and
> spun to give them what they want to hear. 1948 was also the
> year that Rep. LBJohnson defeated Governor Coke Stevenson,
> with the help of the dead voters in the valley lead by
> George Parr, the `Duke of Duval County' and the support of
> Pres. HST. That thrust `Landslide Lyndon' (93 dead voters
> in Duval and Starr Ctys.) onto the national stage. Civil
> rights was not an issue since the democrats had rejected
> the attempt of Hubert Humphrey to put a plank on Civil
> Rights in their platform. They wooed the southern democrat
> vote. Incidentally it was Governor Chris Hollings of South
> Carolina (now a US Senator) who led the fight and signed 
> the legislation to put the Confederate flag on the South
> Carolina State flag. And some think we ought to increase
> the pay of the incompetent ignorant boobs who teach their
> own version of revised history to the little mush brained
> school kids.
> 

The above is merely a mish-mash of fact and fancy, mostly the 
latter.  Roach you are completely discredited and relegated to 
the fringe suthrin' section.  You simply refuse to accept the 
fact that the entire platform of the Dixiecrat Party was 
concerned with segregationist issues.  PERIOD!  Yeah, yeah, 
save your 'possum tainted breath we all know that anything 
such as the actual document which might be posted on the 
internet is actually a fake written by communist symps and 
northern history revisionists.  Just give it up and consign 
your aging relic of a body to your namesakes the roaches.

Monte
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Xns92E6CC62386B4Monte@216.168.3.44>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
References: <Xns92E16150A24D8Monte@216.168.3.44> <FE1AC3579DF5D00A.03269E3CB360B89D.33C06F05D2DBAAF2@lp.airnews.net> <MPG.186198c76ef995dd9897bc@news.verizon.net> <111220022354584374%mikee4821@earthlink.net> <719hvukejr46uu96r4ct5ijlas4djgv8sr@4ax.com> <121220020917008576%mikee4821@earthlink.net> <Xns92E29B9ADAA1FMonte@216.168.3.44> <gdcivugk59s2mchrnlura55jkjhum332pg@4ax.com> <Xns92E2E105EDD61Monte@216.168.3.44>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109097,81f77e72a24b8959
X-Google-Attributes: gid109097,public
X-Google-Thread: 103916,81f77e72a24b8959
X-Google-Attributes: gid103916,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-16 18:05:59 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Monte <GeeDubya@aol.com>
Newsgroups: tx.general,houston.general
Subject: Re: Whitehouse defends Lotts Racism!
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:05:39 -0000
Organization: Mudbugs, Ltd
Message-ID: <Xns92E6CC62386B4Monte@216.168.3.44>
References: <Xns92E16150A24D8Monte@216.168.3.44> <FE1AC3579DF5D00A.03269E3CB360B89D.33C06F05D2DBAAF2@lp.airnews.net> <MPG.186198c76ef995dd9897bc@news.verizon.net> <111220022354584374%mikee4821@earthlink.net> <719hvukejr46uu96r4ct5ijlas4djgv8sr@4ax.com> <121220020917008576%mikee4821@earthlink.net> <Xns92E29B9ADAA1FMonte@216.168.3.44> <gdcivugk59s2mchrnlura55jkjhum332pg@4ax.com> <Xns92E2E105EDD61Monte@216.168.3.44>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 107