Article View: tx.general
Article #403Re: STUPID Texas drivers
From: John Hess
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 1996 00:00
93 lines
4978 bytes
4978 bytes
In article <3228FD6B.1DED@tab.com>, clarks@tab.com says... > >John Hess wrote: >> >> In article <322850E7.7391@tab.com>, clarks@tab.com says... >> > >> >Ed Stimach wrote: >> >> >> >> Clark Simmons wrote: >> >> >> >> > The simple reason that it's not required for a driver driving at the >> >> > posted limit in the left lane to pull over for traffic approaching from >> >> > the rear is because its safer than lane weaving. And it is the law. >> >> >> >> You are incorrect, Clark; >> >> >> >> The law, as it is posted ubiquitously along Texas highways, reads >> >> SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT . However these four simple words together >> >> mean nothing to many drivers. >> >> I will attempt to explain; >> >> >> >> RIGHT refers to the right (outside) lane. >> >> KEEP means stay; in ther words, get over and stay. >> >> TRAFFIC is any motor vehicle allowed on the public highway >> >> SLOWER if a vehicle is travelling, or attempting to travel faster >> >> than the vehicle you are in, then you *are* slower traffic. >> >> There is no mention of velocity or the speed limit. Other >> >> vehicles will either be traveling faster, slower, >> >> or possibly the same velocity, regardless of the posted >> >> limit. >> >> >> >> SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT means if other vehicles are traveling, or >> >> attempting to travel faster than the vehicle you are in, then get over >> >> to the right lane and stay! >> >> >> >> This is the posted law, Clark. >> > >> > >> >From the Texas Driver Handbook, Page 5-11, TRAFFIC AND REGULATORY SIGNS: >> >a picture of the sign is printed. >> > >> >SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT >> >The discription paragraph reads. "If you are driving slower than the >> >normal stream of traffic keep in the right lane". >> > >> >It does not state that you must keep right unless you are THE fastest >> >driver on the freeway. Note that it says "normal stream of traffic". >> > >> >I'm not advocating deliberately impeding traffic. I do insist that if a >> >driver is driving at the posted speed limit, which is usually at or >> >below the posted limit, he is under NO obligation to move to the right. >> >Especially if it's clear that an approaching driver can safely pass on >> >the right. >> > >> >Contrary to opinion, that's what the book says. >> > >> >-- >> >Clark, Still Free in Round Rock! >> > >> >It's better to die standing on your feet in liberty, >> >Than to live crawling on your knees in tyranny! >> >--- >> >Emiliano Zapata >> >> No, >> >> I don't follow your reasoning. If you are going at the speed limit and >> someone is going 5 over, then you are clearly the slower of the two. Even at >> the off chance that the two of you are the only drivers on the road, the >> average speed is 2.5 mph FASTER than you are going. Ergo, you are CLEARLY >> slower traffic. > >Ok, John, one more time. > The book says something to the effect that if you're driving slower >than the normal stream of traffic, you move over. Not if you're driving >slower than the only other guy who's driving faster'n you. > >You don't have to take my word. Read the manual. >-- >Clark, Still Free in Round Rock! > >It's better to die standing on your feet in liberty, >Than to live crawling on your knees in tyranny! >--- >Emiliano Zapata I can see that (to paraphrase your Zapata quote) you would rather die in the left lane in fast traffic than to get out of the way. You keep talking around the subject rather than addressing it. Further response is not justified.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<50c72a$77m@herald.concentric.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4mqiqv$ism@rhea.glo.be> <321D5676.55C1@connect.net> <321D2FD0.186B@i-link.net> <4vkb52$ebd@masala.cc.uh.edu> <4vkns1$h7u@amdint2.amd.com> <321DFAC1.41C6@arlut.utexas.edu> <4vl11k$h05@news1.sunbelt.net> <4vn772$230@herald.concentric.net> <500nv8$9j2@crl14.crl.com> <3224C02A.3A48@bga.com> <322508F4.72EE@tab.com> <32274A0B.6210@hal-pc.org> <322850E7.7391@tab.com> <50astm$rpq@herald.concentric.net> <3228FD6B.1DED@tab.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103916,df84947de7722d9b X-Google-Attributes: gid103916,public X-Google-Thread: 10b82c,df84947de7722d9b X-Google-Attributes: gid10b82c,public X-Google-Thread: 10bedf,df84947de7722d9b X-Google-Attributes: gid10bedf,public X-Google-Thread: 109097,df84947de7722d9b X-Google-Attributes: gid109097,public X-Google-Thread: 104ad1,df84947de7722d9b X-Google-Attributes: gid104ad1,public X-Google-Thread: f52a6,be17f2a68004864 X-Google-Attributes: gidf52a6,public From: johnhess@cris.com (John Hess) Subject: Re: STUPID Texas drivers Date: 1996/09/01 Message-ID: <50c72a$77m@herald.concentric.net> X-Deja-AN: 177813804 references: <4mqiqv$ism@rhea.glo.be> <321D5676.55C1@connect.net> <321D2FD0.186B@i-link.net> <4vkb52$ebd@masala.cc.uh.edu> <4vkns1$h7u@amdint2.amd.com> <321DFAC1.41C6@arlut.utexas.edu> <4vl11k$h05@news1.sunbelt.net> <4vn772$230@herald.concentric.net> <500nv8$9j2@crl14.crl.com> <3224C02A.3A48@bga.com> <322508F4.72EE@tab.com> <32274A0B.6210@hal-pc.org> <322850E7.7391@tab.com> <50astm$rpq@herald.concentric.net> <3228FD6B.1DED@tab.com> content-type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII organization: Concentric Internet Services mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: tx.general,houston.general,austin.general,tamu.general,dfw.general,austin.autos