🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 15:43:51 GMT, Jim McCulloch <mcculloch@mail.utexas.edu>
wrote:

>in article jj0lvugf8oposple1brem71mackn7mu61n@4ax.com, vonroach at
>vonroach@earthlink.net wrote on 12/13/02 5:13 PM:
>
>>...I can't seem to remember this feature in Martin Luther King Jr's
>> `dream'. As I recall he preached against segregation and prejudice. Some
>> Congressional black sheep seem to have lost their way. Some have even thrown
>> away his moral high ground of _non-violence_
>
>You would think from this appropriation of the good name of MLK, that von
>Roach admires him. But this is simply a calculated and cynical rhetorical
>ploy from a doctrinaire republican, trying to make it look as if he, and his
>party, are not racist. How do we know this? Well, because in a current
>discussion in another newsgroup, this very Roach tells us that those who
>opposed the war in Vietnam are traitors, and indeed, "scum".

Er... you undoubtedly mean ML King, Jr, though you are not familiar with his
name 
The former street ally of the Viet Cong makes as many errors in the foregoing
paragraph as he did in the '60's. He attempts to portray his sabotage as a
religious crusade led by MLKing, Jr. All the devisive democrat hacks use this
ploy. The paragraph above points to the hypocritical phonies who call themselves
followers of MAKing, Jr. today - including black racists who re segregate
themselves into black cliques and promote divisiveness and hatred of whites to
exploit other blacks and extort money from legitimate business. The `Revs'
Jackson, Farrakhan, and Sharpton are not MLKing Jrs,  and learned nothing from
his preaching. Apparently Jimbo didn't either.

>Now Von Roach, who is not, for all his other flaws, illiterate, knows full
>well that MLK vehemently opposed the war in Vietnam, and did so from the
>pulpit and in the streets. So it necessarily follows that Von Roach's _true_
>opinion of MLK is that Dr. King was "scum" and a traitor.

Again, the name is M. L. King, Jr.
That must be the opinion of Jimbo, since I  suggest that. ML King, Jr led a
fight against segregation and now the saboteurs of Jim's ilk want to co-opt his
name for their entirely different ideas. They preached hate and divisiveness and
violent opposition to the efforts of the US Army in Vietnam 
 while MLKing, Jr was preaching harmony and non-violent integration. Jimbo uses
the usual democrat tactics of lying and demonization, but why would anyone
expect anything else from an anti-American saboteur.
>