Article View: tx.general
Article #4179Re: Bad Eagle On the New War With Mexico
From: John
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 01:11
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 01:11
78 lines
5033 bytes
5033 bytes
Kingfish. wrote: > "phxbrd" <phxbrd@earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:at2ism$vmjpl$1@ID-149074.news.dfncis.de... > : > : "Lady Liberty" <LadyLiberty@UPAlliance.orgXX> wrote in message > : news:3df4cbb4$1_3@omega.dimensional.com... > : > "Kingfish." <spam_trap_void@yahoo.com> said, and I quote: > : > > : > > > : > > "phxbrd" <phxbrd@earthlink.net> wrote in message > : > > news:at2bj2$vbr97$1@ID-149074.news.dfncis.de... > : > >: Err uh, Frank, You seem to be having a lot of fun with this and it > : seems > : > a > : > >: bit of a shame to jolt you back into reality, but did you happen to > : > notice > : > >: in the News that not one of the 9-11 bombers or their co-conspirators > : > > walked > : > >: across the US-Mexican border? > : > >: > : > >: Believe this or not, but every last one flew into a US airport! > : > >: > : > >: Maybe you and your loose-gripped little friends ort just start > shooting > : > > all > : > >: dark-skinned people as they leave all airports. Just a thought.... > : > >: > : > >: > : > > > : > > I'm sure that would be fine with them. As long as they get to shoot > : some > : > > dark skinned folks. Why are these Texas bigots posting to co.general, > : > > anyway? > : > > : > I don't think someone has to be a bigot to not want unlimited numbers of > : > people illegally coming into this country. > : > : Why is that? Do you think we've abused so many nationalities that we're > : likely to be punished by anyone not American? There was a time when all > : looked up to us. > : > : Every single 9-11 attacker came here legally. Our attacking workers > coming > : in peace smacks of the mentality of grabbing guns from all when a few > : misbehave. We can't find terrorist leaders, so let's beat up some > innocent > : but ambitious Mexicans, huh? > : > > and onto some Libertarian ideals... like freedom of movement - is that for > us and not for "them?" This sounds more like the John Birch Society than > even small "L" libertarianism. > > Why aren't the militias lining up at the Canadian boarder? There are tons > of illegal Canadians here in the US, but they are white enough for us. Why > don't we close the Mexican boarder in a real way? Simple: we need the slave > labor. > > Does it worry any of you that so much of our IT work (including hi-tec, > cryptography, satellite imaging, etc.) is being outsourced to places like > India? Most aren't, but that's because we don't have to see their dark > faces, IMO. There is a much greater security threat there than anyone that > is coming over from Mexico with the desire for a better life. > > KF > Canadian are educated, have their own medical insurance, buy auto insurance, and don't necessarily want to remain in the US. They don't have an annual Marijuana harvest to deliver to the US, and they like to speak english. They use washrooms to relieve themselves and don't leave dirty diapers in food store parking lots. Canadians don't form gangs of Chullos and make cities unsafe. If anyting, they come here and risk being victims of our "diverse" population. Canadians don't want to turn the entire United States into a suburb of Tijuana.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3DF5406E.9080806@theboys.ro>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!nycmny1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!colt.net!diablo.theplanet.net!zen.net.uk!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!news2.west.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<at0sjt$ihp$1@news.chatlink.com> <95e71505.0212090306.7ffe2e2@posting.google.com> <at2bj2$vbr97$1@ID-149074.news.dfncis.de> <MO2J9.2752$ES2.1491253@news.randori.com> <3df4cbb4$1_3@omega.dimensional.com> <at2ism$vmjpl$1@ID-149074.news.dfncis.de> <D17J9.2830$ES2.1517953@news.randori.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,4383c6ecca256864 X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public X-Google-Thread: 10a942,4383c6ecca256864 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public X-Google-Thread: 103916,4383c6ecca256864 X-Google-Attributes: gid103916,public X-Google-Thread: 1084c1,4383c6ecca256864 X-Google-Attributes: gid1084c1,public X-Google-Thread: 109097,4383c6ecca256864 X-Google-Attributes: gid109097,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-09 17:12:27 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!nycmny1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!colt.net!diablo.theplanet.net!zen.net.uk!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!news2.west.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3DF5406E.9080806@theboys.ro> From: John <john@theboys.ro> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: tx.general,az.general,alt.california,houston.general,co.general Subject: Re: Bad Eagle On the New War With Mexico References: <at0sjt$ihp$1@news.chatlink.com> <95e71505.0212090306.7ffe2e2@posting.google.com> <at2bj2$vbr97$1@ID-149074.news.dfncis.de> <MO2J9.2752$ES2.1491253@news.randori.com> <3df4cbb4$1_3@omega.dimensional.com> <at2ism$vmjpl$1@ID-149074.news.dfncis.de> <D17J9.2830$ES2.1517953@news.randori.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 80 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 01:11:28 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.104.184.92 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net X-Trace: news2.west.cox.net 1039482688 68.104.184.92 (Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:11:28 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:11:28 EST Organization: Cox Communications