Article View: tx.general
Article #54Re: Car licensing fees
From: Sam Waring
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 12:14
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 12:14
24 lines
1391 bytes
1391 bytes
Well, the money from the lottery that you're talking about isn't new revenue, as your post seems to imply. The revenue from that is going to keep already-in-place programs funded in *current* levels, measured in constant dollars. It's not a new cash cow. The Lege had several choices before it last session: pass an income tax (which few outside Bob Bullock were brave enough to advocate), pass a lottery, or crank up user fees by a few thousand percent on all sorts of things and close some exemptions in the sales tax (which they also did). The other possibility they could have chosen was to crank up the sales tax into the 10% range. That wasn't very popular politically, either. I've thus far refused to play the lottery. I think the Lege shoulda gone on and had the collective balls to pass an income tax, which is far overdue in this state, but since they didn't and passed a lottery instead, the only way I can protest is by refusing to buy into their lottery. * Origin: The Finish Line (1:382/45.0)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<712332331.1@mdf.FidoNet>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!news.dell.com!natinst.com!balkan!dogface!mdf!uucpShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!news.dell.com!natinst.com!balkan!dogface!mdf!uucp From: Sam.Waring@mdf.FidoNet.Org (Sam Waring) Newsgroups: tx.general Subject: Re: Car licensing fees Message-ID: <712332331.1@mdf.FidoNet> Date: 27 Jul 92 12:14:53 GMT Sender: uucp@mdf.FidoNet.Org Lines: 24