🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <123695@cup.portal.com>, Ted_Eugene_Viens@cup.portal.com writes:

[polite request deleted in the interest of brevity.]

> pandemic with the unimagined growth of the usenet.  Most cross-postings are
> inadvertantly done when one person replies to an earlier posting.  I will again
> ask the author of my automatic mailing software to change it so that a reply
> automatically resets the groups field to only the group in which I am replying.
> I would not be surprised if there is a growing movement to limit all replies
> to usenet postings to the group in which the reply is made.

I understand the problem.  I've even had to endure others doing such things in
my newsgroups.  However, I also don't like letting certain statements go
unanswered.  I consider answering in one newsgroup out of 10 inadequate in
some cases.  (Essentially, that is what you suggested.)  However, sometimes
I do edit the newsgroup lines.  In this case, isn't houston.news supposed
to be a dead newsgroup anyway (i.e. try houston.usenet.config)?


                                                Jim Pritchett


UUCP:  rwsys.lonestar.org!caleb!jdp             "For with God nothing shall
                                                be impossible."   Luke 1:37