🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by Victor B. Schneider, Ph. D. Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:11
Scolding the New Democrats for their recklessness
#2
Author: Victor B. Schneider, Ph. D.
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:11
35 lines
3186 bytes
I don't know how to explain this any other way at the moment, so I'll
just tell you subjectively what I think happens:  Places where I have
been, the buildings have a "memory" of me, and go back into bent 
positions.  In some cases, my Guardian does the bending at new sites
without clearing the matter with me.  So, I have been minimizing my
viewing of scenes from places like New York City the past day, because
it is obvious to me that the buildings are bending over when I tune in.

So, let me give you my subjective belief about why the networks keep
showing the passenger jets crashing in to the Trade Center towers over
and over again.  It is the same reason that they had for showing the
Billy Tauzin "truth in advertising" hearings over and over again.  They
wanted to get me to do something to alter Time.

Well, for the brief moment I was tuned in, I got one of the passenger
jets to slow down.  If you were watching, you would have seen it
approaching the tower from the left of the screen, and seemingly pulsing,
or stopping at a point, then moving forward, then stopping in its path.
Obviously, I didn't stop it.  The question that you idiots should have
been asking yourselves is what would I do with the jet if I had been
able to stop it completely?  There are maybe five seconds of videotape
showing the plane's approach.  Catching me unprepared and asking me to
come up with something clever to misguide the plane without causing some
collateral catastrophe in the five available seconds is a bit much, even
for me.

And, by the way, there is reason to believe that my Guardian did not
want me to do any more than I did.  Or, to put it another way, to stop
the catastrophe completely in this case is to act against God's Will.
Sorry.  Can't be done.

If you're so smart, Democrats and New Liberals, and you have all your
little Peter Potters running around, why didn't you get _them_ to stop
the catastrophe?  All you are doing is proving to me how inadequate you
are.
Re: Scolding the New Democrats for their recklessness
#3
Author: Victor B. Schneider, Ph. D.
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:31
52 lines
4218 bytes
>   Reply to: Victor B. Schneider, Ph. D.
>   Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:11:15 GMT
>I don't know how to explain this any other way at the moment, so I'll
>just tell you subjectively what I think happens:  Places where I have
>been, the buildings have a "memory" of me, and go back into bent
>positions.  In some cases, my Guardian does the bending at new sites
>without clearing the matter with me.  So, I have been minimizing my
>viewing of scenes from places like New York City the past day, because
>it is obvious to me that the buildings are bending over when I tune in.
>
>So, let me give you my subjective belief about why the networks keep
>showing the passenger jets crashing in to the Trade Center towers over
>and over again.  It is the same reason that they had for showing the
>Billy Tauzin "truth in advertising" hearings over and over again.  They
>wanted to get me to do something to alter Time.
>
>Well, for the brief moment I was tuned in, I got one of the passenger
>jets to slow down.  If you were watching, you would have seen it
>approaching the tower from the left of the screen, and seemingly pulsing,
>or stopping at a point, then moving forward, then stopping in its path.
>Obviously, I didn't stop it.  The question that you idiots should have
>been asking yourselves is what would I do with the jet if I had been
>able to stop it completely?  There are maybe five seconds of videotape
>showing the plane's approach.  Catching me unprepared and asking me to
>come up with something clever to misguide the plane without causing some
>collateral catastrophe in the five available seconds is a bit much, even
>for me.
>
>And, by the way, there is reason to believe that my Guardian did not
>want me to do any more than I did.  Or, to put it another way, to stop
>the catastrophe completely in this case is to act against God's Will.
>Sorry.  Can't be done.
>
>If you're so smart, Democrats and New Liberals, and you have all your
>little Peter Potters running around, why didn't you get _them_ to stop
>the catastrophe?  All you are doing is proving to me how inadequate you
>are.

P. S.  My early research, which the Democrats felt threatened enough
to interrupt, indicates that I once knew how to de-materialize an
object the size of a passenger jet, port it elsewhere, and re-materialize
it.  Sorry, since that time, other memories may have been jogged, but
not that one.  You have only yourselves to blame for this, Democrats,
and you "Republicans" who let the Democrats have their way with me, which
is approximately what the Sodomites of Genesis wanted to do with another
victim.

Oh, say, Democrats, why don't you get the Peter Potter author to show
all the children how to do what I describe.  I'll bet you can't.  I'll
bet my knowledge is unique.  And, since you disagree, we'll just see
how badly you want to kick yourselves around the block after I die.
And, I am going to die, never doubt it, that much I know for sure.
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads