Article View: ubc.general
Article #267Re: B.C. Clearcutting
From: Robert Edgar Froese
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 15:19
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 15:19
85 lines
5716 bytes
5716 bytes
*** Note followup: let's move this off ubc.general where noone outside of campus can join in. In article <248pfv$91g@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> holland@geop.ubc.ca writes: > >This argument is true if you think of a forest as a unit consisting of a >single species of tree. Replanting is a good way of creating tree farms >but not a good way of rebuilding a forest. Biological diversity will only >redevelop if there is a near-by forested area that can "colonize" the >open space. I don't know what distances such recolonization is possible >over, or what the relative sizes of the forested vs cleared areas have to >be but I would imagine that the larger the ratio the better. _____________ Many, if not most, tree species have small, light seed with winged attachments that allow for fairly easy dispersion. Pioneer or early seral species are excellent at dispersing seed (Red alder, for example), however these species may not be desired from a management perspective. Biological diversity is a more complex question than an assessment of a forest at a single seral state, such as "old-growth" or climax. After logging, most forests on the coast are innundated by a variety of quick-growing shrub and herb species that are not represented in later seral, or maturity, stages. These species are well adapted to spreading seed from disturbed area to disturbed area. Early seral stages are optimum for different types of wildlife, such as deer which take advantage of the abundance of forage, for example. In fact, abundant shrub growth can hamper the transition to a forested state by shading seedlings out or competing for moisture. Planting, as well as vegetation control techniques such as fire or herbicide application, speed up the process of establishing the tree cover. Once full tree cover is established, vegetation diversity usually declines as shrub and herb layers are shaded out. Accompanying this change is a change in wildlife as well. Further maturity in coastal forest may see another period of increased diversity as early seral tree species are replaced by mature canopy species which reproduce in the shade of the mature forest. Tree death, either by tree-by-tree disturbance or old age, can provide canopy openings allowing for a greater shrub or herb layer in the immediate vicinity. Late-seral tree species do not need to spread there seed quickly, as the conditions for their survival do not exist until after the early seral species have become established. In fact, early conditions may likely be detrimental to their establishment. The diversity represented by changes in time is referred to as temporal diversity and represents different levels of local, or alpha, diversity. Another concept of diversity is the diversity across the landscape. How many different ecosystem types occur in a given area is known as beta diversity. It seems that in recent arguments surrounding forestry issues preservation has been the forefront issue. Should "preservation"in an absolute sense be achieved in any given area it would seem that temporal diversity would be ignored. In fact, forest management has had its part in reducing temporal diversity in some areas by managing to reduce natural forest fires, insects and disease, and increase it in others through harvesting. In my opinion, it would be better to look at what advantages and disadvantages are presented in different levels of the different types of diversity and make management decisions around those options, rather than make an absolute decision surrounding some concept of "preservation." >It is interesting that the logging companies seem to prefer cutting in >old-growth areas rather than regions that they have replanted in the >past. This suggests that either old-growth wood is not as poor as they >tell us that it is, or that the replanting efforts of the past were >very badly done. _____________ Large scale forestry has not taken place in B.C. for a very long time, thus there are not many second growth forests ready for harvest. We are beginning to do so as they come into maturity, an example of which are the roadside logging areas along the highway immediately north of Campbell River. Large scale planting did not occur until the '50s or so and even then it was not done with great knowledge. In many cases the wrong species were planted for the type of site planted on and the forest establishment rate was slowed as a result. Modern planting follows much more strict ecological assessment of forest sites prior to harvest to determine the ecologically appropriate species or species mix. -- Robert Froese VE7MOQ taganov biogeocoenose approach "Clearcutting is not a Crime" taganov@unixg.ubc.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<24b2mf$6f7@skeena.ucs.ubc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!library.ucla.edu!news.mic.ucla.edu!unixg.ubc.ca!taganovReferences:
<CBJBK3.7s2@news.claremont.edu> <248pfv$91g@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,13f2d31c6dae54cc X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: 10c943,13f2d31c6dae54cc X-Google-Attributes: gid10c943,public X-Google-Thread: 10607c,a379c54c730c7268 X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-08-11 08:28:37 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!library.ucla.edu!news.mic.ucla.edu!unixg.ubc.ca!taganov From: taganov@unixg.ubc.ca (Robert Edgar Froese) Newsgroups: ubc.general,bc.general,sci.environment Subject: Re: B.C. Clearcutting Followup-To: bc.general,sci.environment Date: 11 Aug 1993 15:19:43 GMT Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada Lines: 85 Message-ID: <24b2mf$6f7@skeena.ucs.ubc.ca> References: <CBJBK3.7s2@news.claremont.edu> <248pfv$91g@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca