Article View: ubc.general
Article #318Re: De-unionizing UBC
From: Derek Nalecki
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 00:00
48 lines
3087 bytes
3087 bytes
In article <4ee0lq$m5p@grid.direct.ca>, cskelton@direct.ca (craig skelton) says: > [cleanup] >This is true... What some of you guys don't seem to understand is that >unionization of employee's is not up to any one else but the employee's. >They have chosen to band together, and voted to have a union become their >bargaining agent. Unions are there to work for their members, and their Unlesss they have been coerced to it by the union bully-boys with the 'law-enforcement' looking the other way. Unions are mainly there to collect dues and give perks of power and privilege to a handfull of thugs who have grabbed the reigns of power. >members only. So, naturally they keep their members happy by trying to get >them anything and everything. What a lot of people don't seem to understand >the bigger issues that get sh*t on in an argument like this one.. Don't even >garbage men on UBC deserve some job security. If not for them then for their Nobody 'deserves' job security. You *earn* job security by being good at what you do. This is the very problem with leftist/collectivist approach to life. Everything must be delivered on the silver platter. *preferably* unearned. >families (kids). I cannot blame them in the slightest for fighting for just And yyyees. Here are the 'poor, suffering children', always brought to an argument by leftists con-men in lieu of a rational argument. From Billy - I lie therefore I am - Clitor in the US, to Diane "the door knob" Marleau, to every dog and his you-know-what. Pathetic. Obscene. Disgusting. Grown people hiding behind little children; using children. Don't we have laws against child exploitation in this country? >that one issue. >Also, before most of you continue on this topic, I suggest you contact the >BCLRB (labour relations board) and learn about the rules of the game before >you make youself seem silly. (some of you already did.) By disagreeing with your estimed self? Hardly. derek n, RdNck, Pen-Arm of the Righteous, esq. - member in good standing: Homo Sapiens Interregnum (Caucasian persuasion) - Sirs, I am no petty noble; an ancestor of mine by the name of Noah was once the commanding admiral of the combined fleets of my planet. (with apologies to Poul Anderson) ********************* MY OTHER COMPUTER IS A LAP-TOP ********************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4epn2a$20ra@huey.cadvision.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<44hd4r$27q@nnrp.ucs.ubc.ca> <44i7hq$m42@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca> <olau-3009951117160001@port18.annex4.net.ubc.ca> <44ps3m$t9@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca> <dbl <4ee0lq$m5p@grid.direct.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f8a3f,65dc9bb933ee607d X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a3f,public X-Google-Thread: 10c943,65dc9bb933ee607d X-Google-Attributes: gid10c943,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,65dc9bb933ee607d X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public From: naleckid@cadvision.com (Derek Nalecki) Subject: Re: De-unionizing UBC Date: 1996/02/01 Message-ID: <4epn2a$20ra@huey.cadvision.com> X-Deja-AN: 137588540 references: <44hd4r$27q@nnrp.ucs.ubc.ca> <44i7hq$m42@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca> <olau-3009951117160001@port18.annex4.net.ubc.ca> <44ps3m$t9@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca> <dbl <4ee0lq$m5p@grid.direct.ca> organization: CADVision newsgroups: ubc.general,can.university.grad,can.politics