Thread View: ucb.geology
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Jean Paul Turcaud
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:43
A COMPLETELY MISLEAD SCIENCE
Author: Jean Paul Turcaud
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:43
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:43
171 lines
8846 bytes
8846 bytes
This is a reprint of a previous post on sgg pointing to the fact, that all present Gogology Theories are both fraudulent & misleading ! But with the hopeful note, that the True Geology is going to impose itself forcefully, in despite of the rear battle fought by the Wide World Wiles geared by the Oxford Pontiffs ' intellectual slaves ! More and more of devoted True Geologists; Engineers, Physicists, and Tradesmen indeed are joining the ranks of the party of Truth & True Geology !!!! ... and pushing the Gogos and other Suckers back to their Caves, Caverns and other Dens of Ignorance & Superstition such as Caltech, the MITH, the ULB, and last but not least, that most infamous ANU !!!! ... at the antipodes indeed of Scientific Intelligence & Awareness ! ... a stinking Lair of Intellectual Terrorism imposing on trusting young minds such horrors as the Glaaaaciations, the Waggoner 's Continental Rafting, fraudulent Theories of Earth Accretion & Stability on Orbit !!! ... and a good hundred other Horrors ! What a shameful lot of worthless & immoral Bludgers ! Pathetic ! ( just to think that at one time ...but thankfully some devoted Mining lying-thieves prevented it ! ) Please read on now ! ***************************** My dear Sir, Any communication of that nature not taking the UPL* ( Universal Pressure Law ) in account, is completely worthless and deserves immediate vertical filing into the bin ! How can proper understanding of any aerolite impact be understood, without knowing the Hydraulic & Pneumatic consequences and Engineered indeed counter reaction to such impact ? Only the UPL allows in that case correct calculation to be made in term of Energy absorbed by the planet and dissipated in different form ! Further you datations and clay invasion are completely erroneous, since only through a massive water displacement could such granulometric discrimination and repartition be engineered ! ... and as I have experienced it time and time again, one of the simplest teaching of the True Geology, to wit the CYCLONIC GRANULOMETRIC PATTERN OF PLEISTOCENE SEDIMENTATION, is completely beyond the reach of your Gogologists Universities- brainwashed & -programmed minds ! Your problem my dear Georges, is that being unable to understand the most simple errors of your fraudulent Gogology most fraudulent sci000nce, it follows that the more complex ones are beyond both yours and your little Mates ' grasp ! With best regards *UPL : discovered by an Australian Mining Pioneer, and corner stone since of the True Geology -- Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud Australian Mining Pioneer Hydro & Mining Prospector _ Senior Geologist Discoverer & Legal Owner of Telfer; Kintyre & Nifty Mines The Great Sandy Desert.of Australia Discoverer of the South Atlantic Submarine Gold Placers ( 40 Millions Tons estimate ) Founder of the TRUE GEOLOGY ~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~ " George" <George@george.net> a οΏ½crit dans le message de news:dzU0c.27320$0l1.19744@bignews3.bellsouth.net... > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3520837.stm > > By Paul Rincon > BBC News Online science staff > > Scientists may have destroyed the well-established theory that a single, > massive asteroid strike killed off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. > New data suggests the Chicxulub crater in Mexico, supposedly created by the > collision, predates the extinction of the dinosaurs by about 300,000 years. > > The authors say this impact did not wipe out the creatures, rather two or > more collisions could have been responsible. > > The report is published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. > > An international group of scientists led by Professor Gerta Keller, of > Princeton University, US, looked at a continuous sequence of rock - a core - > drilled out of the Chicxulub structure. > > They analysed rock from this core using five separate indicators of age, > including fossil planktonic organisms and patterns of reversals in the > Earth's magnetic field. > > The results suggest the 180-km wide crater was punched into the Earth > 300,000 years before the dinosaurs disappeared from the face of the planet. > > At numerous sites around the world, a clay layer separates rocks laid down > in the Cretaceous Period from those deposited in the Tertiary and is known > as the K-T boundary. > > It marks the point in time when the dinosaurs died out and was first linked > to the Chicxulub crater in 1991. > > The researchers contend their findings prove the Chicxulub impact did not by > itself trigger the extinction of the great beasts. > > Instead, Professor Keller believes a cooling of the global climate shortly > followed by a period of greenhouse warming placed enormous stress on the > dinosaurs. > > This warming could have been kicked off by carbon dioxide released by a > massive eruption of lava from the Deccan traps in India. > > The Chicxulub impact occurred during this warming period and, although the > environmental effects were severe, it did not cause the extinction of the > dinosaurs. > > The team believes a second impact, 300,000 years after the Chicxulub > collision, finished off the creatures. > > "When the K-T boundary impact finally came, it hit an already stressed > community. To use a cliche, it was the straw that broke the camel's back. > Almost anything could have wiped them out at that point," Professor Keller > told BBC News Online. > > The structure of the sea bed beneath the Indian Ocean suggests this second > impact could have been there, Professor Keller added. > > Understandably, the team's conclusions have met with strong opposition. > > "It appears to contradict many other lines of evidence that seem rather > unambiguously to indicate that the [Chicxulub] crater formed at the K-T > boundary," said Dr David Kring of the University of Arizona, US. > > Professor Alan Hildebrand of the University of Calgary, Canada, told BBC > News Online: "[This theory] has survived every test. The asteroid that made > Chicxulub acted alone." > > Professor Hildebrand and Dr Kring were authors of the 1991 paper proposing > Chicxulub as the site of the K-T boundary asteroid strike. > > Strong supporting evidence comes from molten material laid down at the K-T > boundary in rocks from Haiti which is similar to deposits from the Chicxulub > crater. > > In addition, debris thrown out by this collision gets thicker the closer you > get to Chicxulub like a trail pointing to the impact site. > > And Dr Joanna Morgan, of Imperial College, London, UK, told BBC News Online: > "An impact the size of Chicxulub occurs on Earth about every 100m years. > > "That two such impacts occurred within 300,000 years and both hit the Earth > at almost exactly the same place is statistically unlikely. > > "Not impossible, but very, very unlikely," said the researcher who is also > investigating Chicxulub core material. > > > > >
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads