🚀 go-pugleaf

This is a kind forward from sci.geo.geology.
Please read on !
*********************************


In any case for all those reasons,  who have all to support President
Georges W. Bush !

He is someone who is able to stand for his own, and knows the difference
between Friends and Enemies ... and able indeed to get right onto the
Bastards ' arses whoever & wherever  they are !
He has proven it !
While the other sods are so gutless than unable to make that moral choice
for their people,  and are indeed Traitors to America i.e. those shameful
Clinton and Carter kinds !!! ... who  lowered the guard of the USA and
allowed it to be hit right at the heart !

... and another one from that traitor crew is now climbing on a soapbox to
give lessons  !!! ... and pretending able to do what they never did !
A definitive Buffoon indeed !

Any person of quality can see through that evident fraud, and I am sure you
can too, dear Jo !


A GREAT COUNTRY SUCH AS AMERICA DESERVES A GREAT PRESIDENT  !!!
A GREAT PRESIDENT SUCH AS PRESIDENT BUSH IS BEST FOR AMERICA !!!


LET ' S PRAY OUR ALMIGHTY CELTIC GOD TO PROTECT AMERICA...
AND HIS MOST ADMIRABLE & GALLANT PRESIDENT GEORGES . W. BUSH !



-- 
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australian Mining Pioneer
Hydro & Mining Prospector _ Senior Geologist
Discoverer & Legal Owner of Telfer; Kintyre & Nifty Mines
The Great Sandy Desert.of Australia
Discoverer of the South Atlantic Submarine Gold Placers
 (  40 Millions Tons estimate )
Founder of the TRUE GEOLOGY

~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~


"CAP" <seismos20@hotmail.com> a �crit dans le message de
news:I4t6c.1606$1r6.165@fe2.texas.rr.com...
>
> "Jo Schaper" <joschapern4ospam@2socketdot.no5net> wrote in message
> news:105c8j2cks5olf0@corp.supernews.com...
> > mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:
> > > In article <4c12acf8.0403142043.6d49cb49@posting.google.com>,
> SeismoSurfer@hotmail.com (Petra) writes:
> > >
> > >>JP,
> > >>
> > >>Perhaps President Bush looks better from afar.  Frankly, I'm less
> > >>impressed with him than I was his father.  I think his father
> > >>possessed more vision and drive.  He also seemed to be more interested
> > >>in doing the right thing, versus doing some thing.
> > >>
> > >>I sent e-mail to the president several months ago and let him know
> > >>directly I was not in support of his desire to see people who live
> > >>together being forced to marry each other, because both of them were
> > >>welfare recipients.   As we all know, marriage is an iffy thing at
> > >>best and to force two people to marry whom otherwise were not inclined
> > >>to do so, for the sake of saving money for U.S. taxpayers I think is
> > >>unholy.   I rather feel this crosses the line between church and state
> > >>and no president should encourage such behavior.
> >
> > I am also infinitely tired of people assuming that folks living together
> >   are sexually involved regardless of gender. There are many financial
> > advantages for people to share expenses as roommates, and many
> > non-sexual reasons for people to be permanently single.
> > >>
> > >>And we shall forever ask, as did those in Parliament of Tony Blair,
> > >>where are the weapons of mass destruction?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Frankly, it is irrelevant.  You're facing a movement bent on
> > > destruction and domination.  You've to dry up the swamp where this
> > > movement grows and in order to do it, you've to get into this swamp.
> > > Failure to comprehend this is a mark of absence of intelligence.
> >
> > Interesting. I thought the US was  bent on the spread of its ideology
> > and mores also. We've done so for my lifetime, at least.  There probably
> > was/is justification for seeking out the perps of 9/11. No question.
> > People seem to forget that the week after that incident, many otherwise
> > hostile world leaders expressed sincere sympathy. However,"fixing" Iraq
> > may yet backfire in that the cure may prove worse than the disease, and
> > coveting a country simply because of oil (where some of that oil became
> > unrecoverable in the short run, and some unrecoverable in the long run
> > due to cowboy tactics) probably wasn't the brightest idea out of the
> > bunch. International politics is actually quite complex, even though the
> > popular media insists on turning it into a  good guys/bad guys
> shoot-em-up.
> > >
> > >>I'm sorry JP, I don't agree. But most likely those who wish to vote
> > >>will have to choose between the lesser of two, whom they care little
> > >>about.   As Americans we should look behind the scenes to see what is
> > >>going on in government while we are under constant threat of
> > >>terrorism.   Is it real, or is it just media worthy?
> > >
> > >
> > > You mean, is the terrorism real?  Sigh.
> >
> >
> > Terrorism is real. However, there are many sorts of terrorism, including
> >   the terrorism of fear self-imposed in the name of 'security'. If I
> > have to choose, I'd rather be free than secure, and take my chances.
> > Some security measures are prudent;(no bowie knives onboard airplanes)
> > others are paranoia in the service of controlling the population (taking
> > blunt plastic kindergarten scissors from elderly vacationers). Right
> > now, paranoia still seems to be in ascendance.
> >
> Sometimes, I think you think like a fool, Jo.  Terrorism is a real thing
and
> not a fear of self-imposed 'security' measures.  I am sure you have never
> lived overseas in so-called police states, but you should just to know
what
> 'security' measures are.  We are almost fine with our measures to ensure
> that the populace of the United States is secure.  To hell with the rest
of
> the world, it is time we care about ourselves and stop immigration without
> checks and double checks. The dollar is at an all time low right now and
we
> are opening our borders for dollars spent here.  Too many people are
coming
> in, we should make our superior products more scarce on the open market
> outside our borders.  The we can be sure that the homeland security group
> are doing their job.
>
> And as far as your opening paragraph, same sex couples, whatever, are not
> going to be geologically significant since they cannot procreate.  So they
> do not exist as humans.
>
> Alan
>
>