🚀 go-pugleaf

waltern@wilde.rand.org (Walter Nelson) mentions:
>JCDill (jjjjcdill@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>: IMHO waltz is romantic, but NOT sexy or sensual.
>
>It's all what you make of it.  I think there is something to be said for a
>dance with a moderate, measured tempo, where you have the time to really
>experience your partner: to look at her, to touch her, and even to smell
>her, all while gliding along to some of the most beautiful music around.
>Yeah, it's romantic, but it works for me on a lot of, how shall I put it,
>more primitive levels too.

I understand!  But, what I think you feel happening, is that when you
are involved in a *romantic* waltz with someone with whom sexy
feelings are appropriate, you find that "the romance makes you feel
sexy".  That *doesn't* mean that a romantic *waltz* is sexy.  Do you
see the difference?

--

My first name has 2 letters,  There's only one letter "J".
My last name's a bit longer,  It just worked out that way.
I hate spam, and UCE, and all that unwanted mess.
So, to reply, you have to edit, my return address.