🚀 go-pugleaf

Joan, it hardly seems like a month has gone by since your last tirade,
but here you are once again on time in your fantasy roll as net cop.
Have you considered periodic doses of Prozac? Perhaps a hormone fix? 

jjjjcdill@ix.netcom.com (Joan Dill) wrote:

>>> I would suggest you consider the lack of follow-ups as indicative of
>>> the interest in your project...
>
>:Technophile <dnc@geocities.com> mentions:
>>
>>I get a lot a positive e-mail about my project as well as ~ 50,000
>>accesses a month...<snip>
>
>Joan said:
>
>No, what I said is that if you don't get any follow-ups, you should
>consider that indicative of the interest in your posts.

Joan, I don't suppose in your fervor to attack you realize you are the
one continuing to respond to the gentlemens post. 
>
>Implied was that you thus might want to stop repeatedly posting.  Your
>posts are not about dance, and dancers aren't posting follow-ups.
>Thus, perhaps, your posts in these dance newsgroups are out of place
>and shouldn't be repeated.

Joan, are your posts concerned about dance? Is this one? 
>
>Now, if there ARE dancers that find your posts of interest and
>pertinent to these dance newsgroups, and they post opinions of such,
>of course then there *would* be interest.  

Joan, you seem to be so hell-bent on attacking the windmills of your
inane and outrageous 'mission,' I'd be suprised if you'd recognize
anyone elses interests.

>So far, I haven't seen it.

The blind rarely see.

Joan, it's time to take about a one-week break from the Net. Hope you
feel better.

Ed     c];^?
Salto ergo sum, in saltatus veritas.

My return address is disguised. Remove the leading X to reply.