🚀 go-pugleaf

I'm ad,otted;uly new on this beat, but if some kind soul could please
explain what in J??'s post was so offensive to warrant such venom spat
back at her? I didn't know what the J stood for until the two Joan
brutalizers got in high gear, I go back to Tom's point about a need
for some "body-language" lingo; can this nastiness toward Joan,
whoever she is, really be proportion to her "crime"?

Xedbj@ix.netcom.com (Ed Jay) wrote:


>Joan, it hardly seems like a month has gone by since your last tirade,
>but here you are once again on time in your fantasy roll as net cop.
>Have you considered periodic doses of Prozac? Perhaps a hormone fix? 

>jjjjcdill@ix.netcom.com (Joan Dill) wrote:

>>>> I would suggest you consider the lack of follow-ups as indicative of
>>>> the interest in your project...
>>
>>:Technophile <dnc@geocities.com> mentions:
>>>
>>>I get a lot a positive e-mail about my project as well as ~ 50,000
>>>accesses a month...<snip>
>>
>>Joan said:
>>
>>No, what I said is that if you don't get any follow-ups, you should
>>consider that indicative of the interest in your posts.

>Joan, I don't suppose in your fervor to attack you realize you are the
>one continuing to respond to the gentlemens post. 
>>
>>Implied was that you thus might want to stop repeatedly posting.  Your
>>posts are not about dance, and dancers aren't posting follow-ups.
>>Thus, perhaps, your posts in these dance newsgroups are out of place
>>and shouldn't be repeated.

>Joan, are your posts concerned about dance? Is this one? 
>>
>>Now, if there ARE dancers that find your posts of interest and
>>pertinent to these dance newsgroups, and they post opinions of such,
>>of course then there *would* be interest.  

>Joan, you seem to be so hell-bent on attacking the windmills of your
>inane and outrageous 'mission,' I'd be suprised if you'd recognize
>anyone elses interests.

>>So far, I haven't seen it.

>The blind rarely see.

>Joan, it's time to take about a one-week break from the Net. Hope you
>feel better.

>Ed     c];^?
>Salto ergo sum, in saltatus veritas.

>My return address is disguised. Remove the leading X to reply.