Article View: uiuc.consumers
Article #41Re: Cablevision lies
From: Khan
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 21:10
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 21:10
51 lines
2795 bytes
2795 bytes
In article <1992Sep2.170848.10491@mcc.com> amck@mcc.com (Alan McKendree) writes: >In article <Btxpp4.C98@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes: >> >> So what did re-regulating the cable companies do for me? I cheered it on >> when I heard about it, but I don't know the details. >> >> I have lived in my present location for 2 and a half years. In that time >> my monthly cable bill ( for "extended" basic "regular" service ) has gone >> from 13.95 to 25.35 a month! > >And yet...and yet...he still continues to subscribe! Amazing! What >power the cable companies must wield over this helpless pawn of his >environment! I don't know where you live, but around here the over-the-air channels come in fuzzy, snowy, and ghosty. Basically, it's a choice between rapacious cable fees or nothing to watch. That's why many people bite the bullet and subscribe to cable, myself included. Believe me, if I had room for a dish, I would dump cable in a second. At present, however, I have no real alternative. :-( >> Do you KNOW that they would like to charge me an ADDITIONAL FIVE DOLLARS >> for each TV set hooked up in the house? No additional services, just >> more extensions. > >The fiends! > >Your position is self-contradictory. If having cable on more than one >TV _weren't_ an additional benefit (i.e., service), there would be no >reason for you to desire it. And yet you complain about having to pay >for it. Do you think you should get free rugs in all your rooms after >paying for the first one, too? Such a snide attitude you have, my friend. Tell me, do you think that the phone company should charge you $5 extra per month for EACH and EVERY PHONE you have connected to your phone line in your home? Even if you OWN those phones? I notice that the phone company doesn't try to charge you for having a phone jack in your bedroom as well as your living room. Why should the cable company be any different? >Sheesh. Indeed. >BTW, I don't have cable, but I'll soon be starting a bboard for >irritating whiners While you're at it, why not start one for irritating and off-base flamers.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BtyytA.DLs@news.cso.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!usenetReferences:
<1992Sep2.170848.10491@mcc.com> <1992Aug28.180447.31477@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <1992Aug28.205213.761@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <Btxpp4.C98@cmptrc.lonestar.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: uiuc.consumers,rec.video.cable-tv,alt.cable-tv.re-regulate Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet From: tmkk@uiuc.edu (Khan) Subject: Re: Cablevision lies References: <1992Sep2.170848.10491@mcc.com> <1992Aug28.180447.31477@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <1992Aug28.205213.761@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <Btxpp4.C98@cmptrc.lonestar.org> Message-ID: <BtyytA.DLs@news.cso.uiuc.edu> Sender: usenet@news.cso.uiuc.edu (Net Noise owner) Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 21:10:21 GMT Lines: 52