🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: uk.comp.misc
Article #18

Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ?

#18
From: Eric Shaw
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 22:57
14 lines
1253 bytes
In article <4ja2v5$vp4@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, davidsen@tmr.com (bill
davidsen) wrote:

>If you have it set up correctly and it doesn't work, you could have
>a bad modem. But the very common cause is some problem with flow
>control, usually "there isn't any."

Nope, its definately set with the locked DTE and everything.  Sportster
Vi's are just broken that way.  Even regular USR Sportsters don't exhibit
*this* particular problem, with the same computers, just the Sportster
Vi.  It works at 38400 - if the DTE was changing to DCE that wouldn't
work. It just doesn't work at 57600 or 115200 (in addition to problems
with error correction negotiation, v.34 negotiation, recognizing people's
voices as faxtones, and general flakiness).
Technical Details
Message-ID: <eric-2803961757140001@sobt.ao.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sobt.ao.net!user
References: <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <5ynumDAxPtQxEwJA@nts1.demon.co.uk> <4i88th$qj7@piglet.cc.utexas.edu> <eric-2203962225330001@sobt.ao.net> <4ja2v5$vp4@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sobt.ao.net!user
From: eric@ao.net (Eric Shaw)
Newsgroups: uk.comp.misc,uk.net,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ?
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 17:57:14 -0500
Organization: Access Orlando
Message-ID: <eric-2803961757140001@sobt.ao.net>
References: <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <5ynumDAxPtQxEwJA@nts1.demon.co.uk> <4i88th$qj7@piglet.cc.utexas.edu> <eric-2203962225330001@sobt.ao.net> <4ja2v5$vp4@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sobt.ao.net