Article View: uk.comp.misc
Article #8Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ?
From: Andrew Sayers
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 23:41
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 23:41
16 lines
1086 bytes
1086 bytes
John Stanners <webmaster@glen.co.uk> wrote: =>In article <4htnon$i4f@piglet.cc.utexas.edu>, Vic Menayang =><victor@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu> writes =>>with the regular Sportster, the problem at 57.6 setting =>>with the old 28.8 (I don't know about the 33.6). I'm seriously considering the Sportster as a backup to my Courier. What is the main difference between this new Sportster Vi and the older version? bye 4 now Andy From Lincolnshire, England Technology in the Middle of Nowhere!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3144b8f3.2121124@news.globalnet.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.globalnet.co.uk!References:
<31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <4hqstk$h0d@newsgate.dircon.co.uk> <jpa-0903961739590001@ana1054.deltanet.com> <4htnon$i4f@piglet.cc.utexas.edu> <5ynumDAxPtQxEwJA@nts1.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: storm@globalnet.co.uk (Andrew Sayers) Newsgroups: uk.comp.misc,uk.net,comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ? Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 23:41:44 GMT Reply-To: storm@globalnet.co.uk Message-ID: <3144b8f3.2121124@news.globalnet.co.uk> References: <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <4hqstk$h0d@newsgate.dircon.co.uk> <jpa-0903961739590001@ana1054.deltanet.com> <4htnon$i4f@piglet.cc.utexas.edu> <5ynumDAxPtQxEwJA@nts1.demon.co.uk> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182 NNTP-Posting-Host: client824c.globalnet.co.uk Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.globalnet.co.uk!