Article View: uk.comp.os.linux
Article #1065Re: Publicly funded software development (was: KDE v. Gnome)
From: Maciej Stachowiak
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 00:00
47 lines
3502 bytes
3502 bytes
> >I still think the market for free software would be better off without > >the economic distortions of any government funding (other than, say, > > What "market"? > OpenSource Software is not market-driven. > When market economy meets information society, the result is "economic > distortion". Correcting this is what RMS's DAT proposal is all about. > Sure it is. Many parts of it are not a market that involves transfers of money, but assuming money is required for markets the kind of naiive view of markets that only someone who hasn't studied economics would have. It is true that many industry rags measure "market leadership" in dollars, but this is hardly universal; if you are an OS vendor trying to attract ISVs and VARs to your platform, you tell them how many units you ship and how much installed base you have in units, both absolutely and as a percentage of the market, not what percentage you have in dollars. > Here's another proposal: > > Make electronic money a reality, so that free software programmers can > earn money the way treet musicians do: by collecting a penny for each > web hit on their site. Benevolent users would be glad to afford this. > > I think all proposals should be explored and tried. None is perfect. > But each single one is better than market economy. Economic viability for open source only requires that the software market become a service economy rather than a commodity economy. Actually, many sectors already _are_ more service-oriented than product-oriented, so this shouldn't be too much of a problem. Basically, my view, and that of many others, is that customers should pay, not for the software itself, but for the labor of creating, maintaining and otherwise servicing software, much the way legal and medical knowledge operate already. - Maciej Stachowiak -- guile -c '(define c call-with-current-continuation)(define(f s)(lambda(o)(let ((n(c(lambda(x)(o x)x))))(let p((n n)(l(string->list s)))(cond((not (null? l) )(display(car l))(p(c n)(cdr l))))))))((f"Js nte ul akr")(f"utAohrGieHce\n"))'
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<v8w1zod5ya7.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<F0B8I1.475@a2e.de> <907546762snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> <v8wk92dflo7.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> <907786057snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> <v8waf36r9s0.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> <xzqww6aplq8.fsf@uni-paderborn.de> <v8wg1cxy9py.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> <xzqbtnle3ap.fsf@uni-paderborn.de> <v8w7ly8nbkh.fsf@M66-080-10.mit.edu> <F0LuzM.1G6@a2e.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1103af,4460b3faefba3773 X-Google-Attributes: gid1103af,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,942a0596db2b8174 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 10d8ad,4460b3faefba3773 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d8ad,public X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,942a0596db2b8174 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public X-Google-Thread: 10e97a,5c442900c2af201f X-Google-Attributes: gid10e97a,public X-Google-Thread: fea0e,5c442900c2af201f X-Google-Attributes: gidfea0e,public X-Google-Thread: fa692,5c442900c2af201f X-Google-Attributes: gidfa692,public From: Maciej Stachowiak <mstachow@mit.edu> Subject: Re: Publicly funded software development (was: KDE v. Gnome) Date: 1998/10/12 Message-ID: <v8w1zod5ya7.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> X-Deja-AN: 400520738 Sender: mstachow@huis-clos.mit.edu References: <F0B8I1.475@a2e.de> <907546762snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> <v8wk92dflo7.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> <907786057snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> <v8waf36r9s0.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> <xzqww6aplq8.fsf@uni-paderborn.de> <v8wg1cxy9py.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> <xzqbtnle3ap.fsf@uni-paderborn.de> <v8w7ly8nbkh.fsf@M66-080-10.mit.edu> <F0LuzM.1G6@a2e.de> Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.society.futures,comp.os.linux.advocacy,uk.politics.misc,uk.politics.economics,gnu.misc.discuss