Article View: uk.comp.os.linux
Article #1201Re: Publicly funded software development (was: KDE v. Gnome)
From: Joel Peterson
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 00:00
48 lines
3540 bytes
3540 bytes
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > I think most people can agree that mathematical knowledge should not > be patentable. But: > > * The means of performing a computation is mathematical knowledge. > > * Any possible scope of a "software patent" is a means of performing a > computation. All computations that can be performed by a computer are > mathematical, whether or not you express them that way. Inside, the > computer is just pushing bits. > > * Therefore software is mathematical knowledge. > > * Therefore software patents ought not be permitted. > I used to be opposed to software patents and this was one of my main arguments. However, if you really think about it, the argument is less persuasive. The problem with the argument is that if you try hard enough, just about anything can be dismissed as mathematical knowledge. In fact, the logical extension of your argument is that anything that you can do on a computer cannot be patentable since it is just an extension of mathematical knowledge. Many physical inventions are first fully simulated by computer prior to being built. In what way does a simulation differ from a computer program? Are these inventions to be denied patents? You can claim that physical inventions are patentable because they apply mathematical knowledge to do actual work, but making such a claim while insisting that software should not be patentable is implying that software doesn't do actual work. I contend that software does do actual work, and thus should be patentable. Intellectual arguments about the meaning of the word "math" aside, my real reason for supporting software patents remains that the granting of patents encourages innovation by providing a legal means by which a company or organization can profit from developing new software algorithms. -- Index of Alternative Operating Systems http://www.indexos.com Joel Peterson joel@odin-consulting.com President Odin Consulting, Inc. http://www.odin-consulting.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<361F8FBC.196C27@odin-consulting.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<F0B8I1.475@a2e.de> <907546762snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> <v8wk92dflo7.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> <m3btnnd7pj.fsf@c26469-a.clnvl1.ct.home.com> <v8wbtnmra51.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> <m3u31epev9.fsf@c26469-a.clnvl1.ct.home.com> <361ECCE9.A9EEED82@odin-consulting.com> <v8waf34nc33.fsf@M66-080-10.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1103af,4460b3faefba3773 X-Google-Attributes: gid1103af,public X-Google-Thread: 10e97a,5c442900c2af201f X-Google-Attributes: gid10e97a,public X-Google-Thread: fea0e,5c442900c2af201f X-Google-Attributes: gidfea0e,public X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,942a0596db2b8174 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,942a0596db2b8174 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: fa692,5c442900c2af201f X-Google-Attributes: gidfa692,public X-Google-Thread: 10d8ad,4460b3faefba3773 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d8ad,public From: Joel Peterson <joel@odin-consulting.com> Subject: Re: Publicly funded software development (was: KDE v. Gnome) Date: 1998/10/10 Message-ID: <361F8FBC.196C27@odin-consulting.com> X-Deja-AN: 399716054 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <F0B8I1.475@a2e.de> <907546762snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> <v8wk92dflo7.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> <m3btnnd7pj.fsf@c26469-a.clnvl1.ct.home.com> <v8wbtnmra51.fsf@huis-clos.mit.edu> <m3u31epev9.fsf@c26469-a.clnvl1.ct.home.com> <361ECCE9.A9EEED82@odin-consulting.com> <v8waf34nc33.fsf@M66-080-10.mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Odin Properties MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 09:43:43 PDT Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.society.futures,comp.os.linux.advocacy,uk.politics.misc,uk.politics.economics,gnu.misc.discuss