Article View: uk.comp.os.linux
Article #1702Re: KDE v. Gnome
From: Phil Hunt
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 00:00
62 lines
3719 bytes
3719 bytes
In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.980928140832.24247A-100000@howard>
patrick@howard.genetics.utah.edu "Patrick" writes:
> No one has managed to explain, from what I have seen, why this goofy
> theory that ideas are hive property doesn't apply to everything, not just
> software. A new tool conceived, designed, and produced by me should be
> free?
You've fundamentally misunderstood the argument. A physical tool is
physical property. The *design* of the tool is an *idea* -- it is
not a physical object. In some countrirs, people are allowed to
own ideas: these owned ideas are called "intellectual property".
> It is merely the steel expression of my idea. Just like a socket
> wrench started out as an idea, the expression of that idea is the steel
> socket wrench. Why should it not be free? It took work to make it. It
> took dilligence and time to express that idea in a concrete form. This
> is NO different than software.
No, it is *very* different from software. Software can be reproduced
at essentailly zero cost. Socket wrenches can't.
> If I write a book, it is copywrited and is my intellectual property. The
> book is analagous to software...it is not a concrete thing, just the
> media that holds the idea (the story) is concrete. Should you be able to
> acquire this book for free?
If the owned of the book gives it to you, yes.
> How about using the idea of my story
> (software) in a story of your own? That is plaigerism and theft, yet
> what are you stealing?
What jurisdiction are you talking about? It most certainly isn't
theft in English law.
> So, a socket wrench, a story in a book, software...all expressions of an
> idea that an INDIVIDUAL had.
Yes, building on the ideas of *lots* of other people.
> Not a hive, not a collective mind, and individual.
No. Take the program I am using to write this article on. It builds on
many ideas, including: writing, computers, electronic stored program
computers, the von Neumann architecture, cathode ray tubes, assembly
language, high-level languages, the Internet, email, Usenet.
These ideas were developed by thousands of people. No one person could
invent them all: they are the result of a collective intelligence.
> It only derived
> from their personal mind which is NOT the property of anyone but themselves.
>
> patrick
>
>
--
@@--Phil Hunt-----------------------------Don't fear the penguins(*)--@@
@@ [*] Disclaimer: this is FREE ADVICE, and is distributed in the @@
@@ hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; note also @@
@@ that this advice may not apply if your name is Gates or Ballmer. @@
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<907101443snz@vision25.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.SOL.3.91.980928140832.24247A-100000@howard>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1103af,4460b3faefba3773 X-Google-Attributes: gid1103af,public X-Google-Thread: f4bda,4460b3faefba3773 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bda,public X-Google-Thread: 10d8ad,4460b3faefba3773 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d8ad,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,942a0596db2b8174 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,942a0596db2b8174 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public From: philh@vision25.demon.co.uk (Phil Hunt) Subject: Re: KDE v. Gnome Date: 1998/09/29 Message-ID: <907101443snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 396144784 References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.980928140832.24247A-100000@howard> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!vision25.demon.co.uk X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 907108475 mail2news:17592 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk Organization: here Reply-To: philh@vision25.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss