🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <87zpbkzhbq.fsf@ivm.de>,
	Klaus Schilling <Klaus.Schilling@home.ivm.de> writes:
> Jason Clifford <jason@dlsl.demon.co.uk> writes:
> 
>> In article <slrn70tk2u.qt.jedi@dementia.mishnet>, jedi@dementia.mishnet
>> writes
>> >>His (and my) ideas most certainly are his own 'property'.
>> >
>> >       In terms of whether or not he can use the apparatus 
>> >       of the state in order to enforce those rights, they
>> >       are not. They are not natural rights nor are they       
>> >       property in any other sense they are used in the law
>> >       or in philosphy for the most part.
>> 
>> An idea has no absolute meaning until it is expressed. The form of
>> expression we are refering to is the production of a product (or
>> service).
>>
> That's a lie invented by ruthless anti-platoinists.
>  
>> If someone has a great idea for a software product and proceeds to
>> realise that idea, his rights to that are absolutely enforcable.
>> 
> Only by corrupt legislation, but never by divine ethics.
> 
>> In any event, the point of this little side-track is that ones ideas are
>> NOT part of some overall collective consciousness as previously
>> suggested by someone else.
> 
> That's just evil materialist propaganda.
> 
> 		Klaus Schilling

And you sir are a troll.

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bob Taylor             Email: brtaylor@inreach.com            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Like the ad says, at 300 dpi you can tell she's wearing a     |
| swimsuit. At 600 dpi you can tell it's wet. At 1200 dpi you   |
| can tell it's painted on. I suppose at 2400 dpi you can tell  |
| if the paint is giving her a rash. (So says Joshua R. Poulson)|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+