Article View: uk.comp.os.linux
Article #1898Re: Unix utilities available under DOS
From: Michael Moller
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 00:00
9 lines
1116 bytes
1116 bytes
On this note: Has anyone tried porting bash to dos? If not why not? I'd imagine that the executable would have to be smaller than 64k, but even a watered-down bash would be an improvement over command.com. ...just another random thought... l8r mike
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<57bebl$sc6$1@newnews.mikom.csir.co.za>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<848471160snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> <slrn59ap1c.r8.davep@hagbard.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f8c9b,a131082ba67f323d X-Google-Attributes: gidf8c9b,public X-Google-Thread: f72b0,a131082ba67f323d X-Google-Attributes: gidf72b0,public X-Google-Thread: 1103af,a131082ba67f323d X-Google-Attributes: gid1103af,public X-Google-Thread: 10d8ad,a131082ba67f323d X-Google-Attributes: gid10d8ad,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,a131082ba67f323d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: mmoller@mmoller.mikom.csir.co.za (Michael Moller) Subject: Re: Unix utilities available under DOS Date: 1996/11/25 Message-ID: <57bebl$sc6$1@newnews.mikom.csir.co.za> X-Deja-AN: 198541120 references: <848471160snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> <slrn59ap1c.r8.davep@hagbard.demon.co.uk> organization: none newsgroups: uk.comp.os.linux,comp.unix.misc,comp.unix.questions,comp.os.linux.misc,gnu.misc.discuss