Article View: uk.comp.os.linux
Article #592Re: Distribution for 'techies'
From: Mark Baker
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 00:00
16 lines
1202 bytes
1202 bytes
In article <slrn5ifiqo.64i.stevey@stevey.webmedia.co.uk>, stevey@stevey.webmedia.co.uk (Steve Mynott) writes: > My subjective impressions are that: Debian is perhaps more configurable, > where Redhat is easier to install. Debian 1.2 needs 7 disks and the > CDROM. Debian needs five discs currently. The next version should install off one disc for CD, though will still need lots of discs for an ftp install (which I don't think RH supports) or an nfs install (which RH will do off one disc) > I believe Redhat is far fewer now. Redhat will do CD or nfs installs off one disc, or, if you already have dos installed, it can use loadlin to boot without using any floppies at all.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5g907o$f40@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5g4kc7$1g8@loth.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac57,596be1594862c550 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac57,public X-Google-Thread: 10d8ad,596be1594862c550 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d8ad,public From: mnb20@cam.ac.uk (Mark Baker) Subject: Re: Distribution for 'techies' Date: 1997/03/13 Message-ID: <5g907o$f40@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk> X-Deja-AN: 225427370 References: <5g4kc7$1g8@loth.demon.co.uk> Organization: University of Cambridge, England Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.linux,demon.tech.unix