🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <m3ln2ro5i9.fsf@thyme.td.micromuse.co.uk>,
Tim Haynes <piglet@glutinous.custard.org> wrote:
> Phillip Lord <plord@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk> writes:
>> Indeed I would agree with you. However I would not suggest that someone
>> who does not agree with you, "clearly knows nothing about what "open"
>> [...] means".
> 
> (Did I really say that?? (My news server here doesn't have enough of the
> thread. Bah!))

What you actually said was (cutting and pasting from the original
article - look it up on dejanews if you want a more precise referent.)

| Obviously you don't know what 'Open' as applied to 'Open Source' means
| in the first place, [..]

So while you didn't say those exact words, they certainly seemed to be
echoing the sentiment expressed in your original statement.  HTH!

Donal.
-- 
Donal K. Fellows    http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~fellowsd/    fellowsd@cs.man.ac.uk
-- The small advantage of not having California being part of my country would
   be overweighed by having California as a heavily-armed rabid weasel on our
   borders.  -- David Parsons  <o r c @ p e l l . p o r t l a n d . o r . u s>