Article View: uk.comp.os.win95
Article #1072Re: inodes and clusters (Re: Currant Bun)
From: Trevor Best
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 00:00
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 00:00
61 lines
4024 bytes
4024 bytes
Richard Watson <rwatson@pwdltd.co.uk> wrote in message news:m2r9f62kz9.fsf@bluesharp.pwdltd.co.uk... > "Trevor Best" <trevor@easynet.co.uk> writes: > > on looking in there, can't blame the OS for that. In linux, Nutscrape > > insisted on installing on my very small root partition and not on my /usr > > partition where all the other apps went, it didn't give me a choice and > > nearly broke the OS because the root was nearly out of space. > > Do you mean it installed onto /opt? Shurely it didn't make a /netscape directory > all of its own? Can't remember, probably. It for sure didn't go into /usr, where there was gigs and gigs of space. > > Message best ignored, for best performance in 95/98, defrag a partition, set > > windows swap file on that partition with a fixed size, min & max being the > > same, Windows tells you this will hinder performance but the message is > > wrong, it gains you performance as Windows will no longer spend time > > resizing the swap file so this is faster. > > I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult when installing from scratch for the > installer to be user friendly and do all this for you at least with > the user's permission. Sorry I forgot MS don't ask those kind of questions. Yes, MS reckon on the level of user to not be an expert in such matters. > Why is it that even if you specify that you _dont_ want some things > (outlook express and IE5 spring to mind) put on during install, when you > reboot (for the third time) there they are? They don't want you to have to go to the trouble of downloading and installing nutscrape :-) > > The messages like that in Windows > > are there because MS consider your average Windows user to be a Current Bun > > reader :-) For NT it's best to spread the swapfile over several disks if you > > have them (not several partitions on the same disk). > > > > Incidentally what size do you set your (a) W9X and (b) NT swapfiles to? Depends on my wants, needs and haves. ATM at home I have Windows managing it as I haven't yet gotten around to setting it up myself. On my old P75 in Win95, I would set it about 100MB, that's both when I had the original 16MB and later upped to 48MB. I'll probably do the same if not a little more on my current PC, which has 64MB. At work where I have 128MB and NT I've set it to around 200MB as I only have 1 hard disk, given more disks I would set a swapfile on each disk around the 64MB mark. Under 98 at work (on same PC) I set it to 256MB. Depending on what a machine is used for, I'll generally leave it Windows in the first instance, use system monitor to see how much gets allocated during normal use and go from there.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<86q7ib$2ugc$4@quince.news.easynet.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<SqN7OKbYNzlPwX7cJ3TbbH98bz5a@4ax.com> <85lo09$t58$7@quince.news.easynet.net> <MPG.12e8806d43c1ba1989b24@localnews.mcc.ac.uk> <387f8676.26457756@news.freeuk.net> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1000114212045.16962A-100000@tardis.tardis.ed.ac.uk> <3880d051.7969 <slrn888ces.lt.rwatson@bluesharp.pwdltd.co.uk> <CheetahPRO_v1.13-n5_27444@blackcat.demon.co.uk> <slrn88a57k.i5.rwatson@bluesharp.pwdltd.co.uk> <86b466$brm$12@quince.news.easynet.net> <m2r9f62kz9.fsf@bluesharp.pwdltd.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025cc,13252e8d26a579ad X-Google-Attributes: gid1025cc,public X-Google-Thread: 109765,13252e8d26a579ad X-Google-Attributes: gid109765,public X-Google-Thread: f88ac,13252e8d26a579ad X-Google-Attributes: gidf88ac,public From: "Trevor Best" <trevor@besty.org.uk> Subject: Re: inodes and clusters (Re: Currant Bun) Date: 2000/01/27 Message-ID: <86q7ib$2ugc$4@quince.news.easynet.net> X-Deja-AN: 578438754 References: <SqN7OKbYNzlPwX7cJ3TbbH98bz5a@4ax.com> <85lo09$t58$7@quince.news.easynet.net> <MPG.12e8806d43c1ba1989b24@localnews.mcc.ac.uk> <387f8676.26457756@news.freeuk.net> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1000114212045.16962A-100000@tardis.tardis.ed.ac.uk> <3880d051.7969 <slrn888ces.lt.rwatson@bluesharp.pwdltd.co.uk> <CheetahPRO_v1.13-n5_27444@blackcat.demon.co.uk> <slrn88a57k.i5.rwatson@bluesharp.pwdltd.co.uk> <86b466$brm$12@quince.news.easynet.net> <m2r9f62kz9.fsf@bluesharp.pwdltd.co.uk> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynet.net X-Trace: quince.news.easynet.net 949002635 96780 193.131.249.8 (27 Jan 2000 19:50:35 GMT) Organization: Easynet Group plc X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Jan 2000 19:50:35 GMT Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.win95,easynet.talk,ed.general