Article View: uk.comp.os.win95
Article #359Re: Hardware reviews: where
From: John Dann
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:05
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:05
53 lines
3549 bytes
3549 bytes
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 21:31:40 +0100, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: >Following my recent request for information on a CD-R drive, people were >quite scathing of PC Pro. > >Which are the best sites magazines for such reviews? IME there isn't one, more's the pity. One of my favourite if sad pastimes is finding Best Buys in one mag's review that are completely slated in others. It's commoner than you may think. Even the reviews in the better mags (within which I'd include PCPro) can fail dismally, especially in their selection of Best Buy, Editor's Choice etc. There are many problems, amongst the commonest being: - Failure to include enough models. That 'comprehensive review' all-too-often consists of only a few mainstream models, padded with unfamiliar brands that were presumably being pushed by PR acquaintances and, with whatever excuse, not including other best-selling models. - Failure to base the review recommendations on up-to-date street prices, but using makers' list prices which can vary considerably in how much they're discounted before appearing as street prices or alternatively what turn out to be very porr guestimates of street price; - Focusing the recommendations or criticisms on aspects that may not be at all relevant to everyday use by most users; - A desperate need to rank the models and to rate them as good or bad, when in all honesty the majority of them would be a perfectly good choice and perform indistinguishably for most users - monitors and display cards being good current examples; I can imagine that the editors are well aware of their review shortcomings, but don't feel it's worthwhile or simply can't allocate the necessary resources to remedy the situation. Forced to pick just one mag I'd go for PC Magazine, which does have a long-term reputation for thorough bench testing, but even here the results are not always reliable. As for websites, the only ones I've found to be really worthwhile are www.storagereview.com plus http://www.xbitlabs.com/storage/ (Russian AIUI), both of which as you might guess are to do with hard drives, CDROMS etc. Even here, while the technical quality of the reviews is good, the coverage of models is limited. Some of the other well-known sites such as Tom's or Anand's can be surprisingly superficial and sometimes plain wrong outside their core expertise of CPUs and motherboards. John Dann
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6645lt01gpkl79i1n7dqq1sqsrevii1b39@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!colt.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!prodata.demon.co.uk!not-for-mailReferences:
<kK0bLzDswKU7EwRV@pigsonthewing.org.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025cc,188fcf118b8a2619 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025cc,public X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,188fcf118b8a2619 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-16 00:06:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!colt.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!prodata.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: John Dann <news@prodata.u-net.com> Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.win95,demon.tech.pc Subject: Re: Hardware reviews: where Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:05:17 +0100 Message-ID: <6645lt01gpkl79i1n7dqq1sqsrevii1b39@4ax.com> References: <kK0bLzDswKU7EwRV@pigsonthewing.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: prodata.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: prodata.demon.co.uk:194.222.83.198 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 995267145 nnrp-08:2692 NO-IDENT prodata.demon.co.uk:194.222.83.198 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 53