🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 at 01:04:55, Dave Mason <dave@lowjobs.co.uk> wrote
in demon.tech.pc:
(Reference: <Xk2p4.7331$uc.158258@nnrp4.clara.net>)

>Well I don't know.  I may have upset a few people here but I thought they were 
>wrong.  I still think so.  If that upsets them so be it. 

I don't think anybody would want to deny you the option of disagreeing
with them. If you think I am wrong, I am more than happy to listen to
your arguments and, if they achieve a consensus within the effective
peer review group within which we write, I will happily admit my error.

However, I do need an argument, cogently expressed, addressing the
points I have made and countering the reasons I give for it. If and when
you feel up to attempting that, please do it. If you can't do that,
hurling abuse does you no good whatsoever and even less good for the
point you wish to make.

I am pretty sure that there are some weaknesses in the position I have
described here. However, I would hold my views out against yours for two
reasons. First, I think they are correct. Secondly, they are safe.
-- 
John Underwood