Article View: uk.comp.os.win95
Article #567Re: Networking/LAN woes!!
From: Mark Booth
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 00:00
58 lines
3833 bytes
3833 bytes
In article <KdtUJGAx0x83EwVT@ch-w.demon.co.uk>, John Chapple <jc@ch- w.demon.co.uk> writes >The disadvantage of the dual speed hubs is that _everyone_ either runs >at 10baseT or 100baseT, depending on the settings on the cards (as >well). Most of the dual speed hubs I have seen do not work like this. What I recognise by a dual speed hub is a hub where each port can be either 10 or 100. Internally all of the 10baseT ports are a logical hub, and all of the 100baseT ports are logically a hub. These two logical hubs are connected by a two port switch (10 on one side, 100 on the other). The total bandwidth of the hub is thus 110Mbps (10+100). One of the reasons why many dual speed hubs are stack-able is that only one of the hubs needs the switch, so all of the others can do without it and save some money. >So you may not get _any_ speed improvement with a dual speed hub, if you >have one 10baseT card permanently connected to such a network. If you have a mixture of 10baseT and 10/100baseT cards in your PCs you should get quite an improvement over just having a 10baseT hubs. I almost went for dual speed hubs, but the price difference to a fully switched system was relatively small given the boost in performance, so I decided to go the switched route. >The real answer is a fully switched 100BaseT/10BaseT hub When I replaced our network, I went for a top tier N-way 100baseT switch which connected all of the second tier switches with all of the servers. The second tier had 2+8 switches (2x100baseT ports and 8x10baseT ports). One of the 100baseT ports was used for the up-link to the top tier switch, one for the machine that needed the most bandwidth. The rest of the machines were placed on the 10baseT ports. Going for this structure was far cheaper than trying to have switched 10/100baseT throughout, and also meant that few machines needed to have their network cards changed. About half of our machines have new enough network cards to do full duplex, and I still have our old shared hub to swap in if anything breaks. We also found switches that are 19" rack mountable, so they just screwed right into our structured cabling system cabinet. Total installation time about 20 mins from opening the box to having the network converted (I swapped everyone over without anyone noticing). Take care, Mark......... -- Mark Booth - My ReplyTo: address is valid, other addresses are for tracking UCE ----------------------------- markbSig@oxim.co.uk ----------------------------- OxIM Ltd. Registered Office 12 Kings Meadow, Ferry Hinksey Road, Oxford OX2 0DP Voice +44(0)1865 204881, Fax +44(0)1865 204882 Registered in England 3619439
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33IrKTAjuoA40ANQ@oxim.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<588.934T2800T12065120@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <938028239.18454.0.nnrp-12.d4e48b20@news.demon.co.uk> <kKbVDCAjKV63EwgH@urban75.demon.co.uk> <1008.935T1700T6714676@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <KXyOUEAFlo63EwVJ@urban75.demon.co.uk> <3kjrN36j3Ms7hmXUR0SG96zGV5PG@news.arrakeen.arrakis.nu> <04bxPCAia363EwBm@urban75.demon.co.uk> <37f5e203.15868836@news.f9.net.uk> <KdtUJGAx0x83EwVT@ch-w.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025cc,c47c11e7b6095439 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025cc,public X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,c47c11e7b6095439 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public From: Mark Booth <markbFrom2@oxim.co.uk> Subject: Re: Networking/LAN woes!! Date: 1999/10/12 Message-ID: <33IrKTAjuoA40ANQ@oxim.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 535687864 Distribution: world X-NNTP-Posting-Host: oxim.demon.co.uk:158.152.26.40 References: <588.934T2800T12065120@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <938028239.18454.0.nnrp-12.d4e48b20@news.demon.co.uk> <kKbVDCAjKV63EwgH@urban75.demon.co.uk> <1008.935T1700T6714676@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <KXyOUEAFlo63EwVJ@urban75.demon.co.uk> <3kjrN36j3Ms7hmXUR0SG96zGV5PG@news.arrakeen.arrakis.nu> <04bxPCAia363EwBm@urban75.demon.co.uk> <37f5e203.15868836@news.f9.net.uk> <KdtUJGAx0x83EwVT@ch-w.demon.co.uk> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 939705906 nnrp-13:23231 NO-IDENT oxim.demon.co.uk:158.152.26.40 Organization: OxIM Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Mark Booth <markbReplyTo@oxim.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.win95,demon.tech.pc