🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: uk.comp.os.win95
Article #587

Re: Networking/LAN woes!!

#587
From: Tom Bird
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00
32 lines
2791 bytes
In article <RmzAvSAHc7+3EwlT@ghastly.demon.co.uk>, 'Dungeon' Dave
<Dungeon@SpamNot.Here> writes
>.. and it came to pass that Tom Bird <hamster@nospam.demon.c
>o.uk> uttered forth:
>>For the record, I just tried full duplex on my new UTP network and the
>>"collisions" light just flashed a lot when it was used.
>>
>>I changed 2 of the 5 connected machines to full duplex.
>>
>>Non duplex -> Non duplex - normal, as expected.
>>Duplex -> Non duplex - more collisions, slight lowering of data rate.
>>Duplex -> Duplex - Collisions by the bucketload, very slow data transfer.
>
>ISTR something in the README of 3Com card software advising
>that you should only use Full Duplex if ALL devices on your
>network support it. If you've got a switched hub then there's some
>protection, but it warned against flicking one card onto full unless
>you were planning on taking the network down quickly.

I think one of them (digital) is set to full duplex anyway, I get a lot
of collisions when I talk to it.  And I've left the setup disk at home.

>Is it possible for you to try flicking ALL 5 connected machines to
>full-D, or at least taking the non-F/D off the network and compare
>the collisions? I'm interested in knowing what happens (don't feel
>like a guinea-pig, do you Tom?)

More of a Hamster.  I did test it, I set two to full duplex and
disconnected the rest.  It just went like last time.  Not to worry, I
think you would need a switch for full duplex.

TB       Busby the cat 1984 - 22.9.1999  :(
Technical Details
Message-ID: <mtvCzKAC3O$3Ewbu@dbqa.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <588.934T2800T12065120@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <938028239.18454.0.nnrp-12.d4e48b20@news.demon.co.uk> <kKbVDCAjKV63EwgH@urban75.demon.co.uk> <1008.935T1700T6714676@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <KXyOUEAFlo63EwVJ@urban75.demon.co.uk> <3kjrN36j3Ms7hmXUR0SG96zGV5PG@news.arrakeen.arrakis.nu> <04bxPCAia363EwBm@urban75.demon.co.uk> <37f5e203.15868836@news.f9.net.uk> <KdtUJGAx0x83EwVT@ch-w.demon.co.uk> <FqaF3fAuG+83Ewmy@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <IE9FkJABvE+3Ew0n@ch-w.demon.co.uk> <YWBCIBAJcy+3Ew2L@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <RmzAvSAHc7+3EwlT@ghastly.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025cc,c47c11e7b6095439
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025cc,public
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,c47c11e7b6095439
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: Tom Bird <hamster@nospam.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Networking/LAN woes!!
Date: 1999/10/07
Message-ID: <mtvCzKAC3O$3Ewbu@dbqa.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 534020242
Distribution: world
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: dbqa.demon.co.uk:194.222.32.233
References: <588.934T2800T12065120@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <938028239.18454.0.nnrp-12.d4e48b20@news.demon.co.uk> <kKbVDCAjKV63EwgH@urban75.demon.co.uk> <1008.935T1700T6714676@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <KXyOUEAFlo63EwVJ@urban75.demon.co.uk> <3kjrN36j3Ms7hmXUR0SG96zGV5PG@news.arrakeen.arrakis.nu> <04bxPCAia363EwBm@urban75.demon.co.uk> <37f5e203.15868836@news.f9.net.uk> <KdtUJGAx0x83EwVT@ch-w.demon.co.uk> <FqaF3fAuG+83Ewmy@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <IE9FkJABvE+3Ew0n@ch-w.demon.co.uk> <YWBCIBAJcy+3Ew2L@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <RmzAvSAHc7+3EwlT@ghastly.demon.co.uk>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 939323386 nnrp-14:16470 NO-IDENT dbqa.demon.co.uk:194.222.32.233
Organization: Tom's TeamServer
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Tom Bird <nrp@dbqa.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.win95,demon.tech.pc