Article View: uk.comp.os.win95
Article #591Re: Networking/LAN woes!!
From: John Chapple
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 00:00
46 lines
3357 bytes
3357 bytes
In article <37f5e203.15868836@news.f9.net.uk>, Simon Patten <s.patten@NOSPAM.id-base.com> writes >ms <mike@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> What about these: >> 3 COM Office connect Hub 8ort 10BT (�55 - or the 4 port version for >> �35), Techworks Buffalo 8 Smart Hub (�50 and claims to be "easy to >> use"!) or a Mayflex 8 port 10 Base T Hub (�47). > >Woah! (Hello Mike! :) 10baseT is for 10Mbit/sec networks, if you're >going for the 100Mbit system you need 100baseT cards and Hub. The cables >are the same though... Strictly speaking the cable isn't the same, though its rare to see any other cable than Cat5, which is what is required for 100baseT nowadays. >I'd recommend spending the extra and going for 100Mbit, the cost >difference is so small now that it's well worth it. However, I think if >I was going down this path I'd consider getting a dual speed hub so that >anyone bringing in a machine with a 10baseT network card could just plug >it into my hub and connect into my network, I've had a few occasions >where I've expected to be able to plug my laptop (which only has >10baseT) into someone's hub but have been unable to do so as it was >100baseT only - most annoying! The disadvantage of the dual speed hubs is that _everyone_ either runs at 10baseT or 100baseT, depending on the settings on the cards (as well). If these are set to automatic they should detect the presence of say a 10baseT card and switch themselves to 10baseT themselves. The hub should also switch to 10baseT. Sometimes this doesn't happen, so its necessary to manually switch each card to the appropriate setting. & don't forget bandwidth is _shared_ with this simple arrangement So you may not get _any_ speed improvement with a dual speed hub, if you have one 10baseT card permanently connected to such a network. The real answer is a fully switched 100BaseT/10BaseT hub, the hub learns the identity of each card fitted to each port & sends the data directly to that particular port, this gives in theory the full bandwidth across each port, with the suitable cards, & may even give duplex (though whether that would give any further speed improvement depends on other factors). -- John Chapple
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<KdtUJGAx0x83EwVT@ch-w.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<588.934T2800T12065120@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <938028239.18454.0.nnrp-12.d4e48b20@news.demon.co.uk> <kKbVDCAjKV63EwgH@urban75.demon.co.uk> <1008.935T1700T6714676@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <KXyOUEAFlo63EwVJ@urban75.demon.co.uk> <3kjrN36j3Ms7hmXUR0SG96zGV5PG@news.arrakeen.arrakis.nu> <04bxPCAia363EwBm@urban75.demon.co.uk> <37f5e203.15868836@news.f9.net.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 1025cc,c47c11e7b6095439 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025cc,public X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,c47c11e7b6095439 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public From: John Chapple <jc@ch-w.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Networking/LAN woes!! Date: 1999/09/30 Message-ID: <KdtUJGAx0x83EwVT@ch-w.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 531084534 Distribution: world Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-NNTP-Posting-Host: ch-w.demon.co.uk:158.152.32.219 References: <588.934T2800T12065120@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <938028239.18454.0.nnrp-12.d4e48b20@news.demon.co.uk> <kKbVDCAjKV63EwgH@urban75.demon.co.uk> <1008.935T1700T6714676@redrobe.demon.co.uk> <KXyOUEAFlo63EwVJ@urban75.demon.co.uk> <3kjrN36j3Ms7hmXUR0SG96zGV5PG@news.arrakeen.arrakis.nu> <04bxPCAia363EwBm@urban75.demon.co.uk> <37f5e203.15868836@news.f9.net.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 938689770 nnrp-07:1886 NO-IDENT ch-w.demon.co.uk:158.152.32.219 Organization: Chapple Hamlin-Wright MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.win95,demon.tech.pc