Re: Homehighway

Article View: uk.comp.sys.mac

Article #332

#332

From: Paul Womar
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 00:00

14 lines
1758 bytes

Stephen Maudsley <Stephen.Maudsley@esgem.com> wrote:

[attributions lost]
> > > > > > > > Nearly, but not quite in that although the maximum speed might
> > > > > > > > be the same, the latency of a TA will be slightly higher.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why?

> It's not clear what the question is but anyway....

It's the one above, why is the latency greater on a TA than via a PCI
card?
-- 
-> The email address in this message *IS* Valid <-

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1dg8h3c.1ecg5ao1lyvoo5N@pwomar.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<6u3tkp$9p4$1@phys-ma.sol.co.uk> <1dfolb1.y1atqbe4ilr8N@pwomar.demon.co.uk> <andrew-2109981332570001@proof.demon.co.uk> <1dfpypm.1s99uwsjkicx8N@roxley.demon.co.uk> <B231777E966844CD@cara.demon.co.uk> <360E7081.116BF9E2@granby.demon.co.uk> <1dg1igp.q8n7h813a5qv0N@p61.nas1.is2.u-net.net> <1dg2zlo.1htv39xkbr360N@pwomar.demon.co.uk> <1dg3cc1.1ikhhxerwkrz5N@p10.nas1.is2.u-net.net> <1dg3f5w.14dqelsv8jen6N@pwomar.demon.co.uk> <1dg56xo.18qqaxn1882ti3N@p61.nas1.is2.u-net.net> <1dg773x.bc2w9bknrdryN@pwomar.demon.co.uk> <36133ACA.B2365C91@esgem.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fc20b,c900168b9f400b81
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc20b,public
X-Google-Thread: 114575,9987c09d9ededda4
X-Google-Attributes: gid114575,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b5a2,fba74b18be7809ff
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b5a2,public
From: {$PW$}@pwomar.demon.co.uk (Paul Womar)
Subject: Re: Homehighway
Date: 1998/10/01
Message-ID: <1dg8h3c.1ecg5ao1lyvoo5N@pwomar.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 396779100
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pwomar.demon.co.uk:158.152.90.30
References: <6u3tkp$9p4$1@phys-ma.sol.co.uk> <1dfolb1.y1atqbe4ilr8N@pwomar.demon.co.uk> <andrew-2109981332570001@proof.demon.co.uk> <1dfpypm.1s99uwsjkicx8N@roxley.demon.co.uk> <B231777E966844CD@cara.demon.co.uk> <360E7081.116BF9E2@granby.demon.co.uk> <1dg1igp.q8n7h813a5qv0N@p61.nas1.is2.u-net.net> <1dg2zlo.1htv39xkbr360N@pwomar.demon.co.uk> <1dg3cc1.1ikhhxerwkrz5N@p10.nas1.is2.u-net.net> <1dg3f5w.14dqelsv8jen6N@pwomar.demon.co.uk> <1dg56xo.18qqaxn1882ti3N@p61.nas1.is2.u-net.net> <1dg773x.bc2w9bknrdryN@pwomar.demon.co.uk> <36133ACA.B2365C91@esgem.com>
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 907267908 nnrp-09:12385 NO-IDENT pwomar.demon.co.uk:158.152.90.30
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4b2
Newsgroups: uk.comp.sys.mac,demon.tech.mac,uk.telecom

Reply to Parent Message