🚀 go-pugleaf

Mercurial Ulcer wrote:
> ah whined:
> 
>>Redundant Massacre Rat wrote:
>>> ah whined:
>>> 
>>>>Creepy Pilot wrote:
>>>>> DLF flushed and announced:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>"macfizz@gmail.com" <macfizz@gmail.com> Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I've written to the abuse-meisters at Google Groups quite a few times
>>>>>>>with no response. You could probably get its ISP to shut the troll's
>>>>>>>access down, but as it has told us already it can go into a cyber-cafe
>>>>>>>anywhere and carry on once more. I dare say some folks would like to
>>>>>>>find the troll's real name and address and go round to discuss the
>>>>>>>matter human to worm, but part of the nature of this kind of pond-life
>>>>>>>is its anonymity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nigel Eastmond <eastmond.news1@kidneys.mac.com> Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The CH thing is not even trolling in the sense that I know it. It's 
>>>>>>>infantile, grossly offensive cross-posting on a level that way 
>>>>>>>out-offends "Macs suck - discuss." I've actually never seen anything 
>>>>>>>like this before, and it makes me wonder that if he could be located 
>>>>>>>then could he actually be prosecuted for libel?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Margolotta <naggingdoubt@thebackofyourmind.invalid> Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well he must be able to be prosecuted for something. I have resisted 
>>>>>>>temptation but his remark that everyone with HIV is a 'dirty faggot' got to 
>>>>>>>me. I know of a bloke with HIV (he sells The Big Issue in Oxford) - he's not 
>>>>>>>gay - he's a haemophiliac. That's right, he acquired the virus via a blood 
>>>>>>>transfusion. When the supplier of the blood was contacted, he didn't even 
>>>>>>>know he was positive - he'd never been tested. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You're right, it's not libellous, but it's surely designed to be provocative? 
>>>>>>>If it had been said in public, it would be incitement to riot/violence, 
>>>>>>>surely.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There MUST be some law he can be prosecuted under, *surely*?! He can't be 
>>>>>>>allowed to get away with it. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Norbert Lieckfeldt <n@lieckfeldt.com> Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, because there's a suspicion that he's broken the law. No-one knows 
>>>>>>>whether he has unless he is being prosecuted by the proper authorities 
>>>>>>>and convicted by a court of law. But the suspicion that he may have 
>>>>>>>should be enough to bring it to the attention of prosecuting authorities 
>>>>>>>who will come to a decision on whether to prosecute or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>5605 <not@chance.com> Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I refer you all to Section 4a of the Public Order Act 1986. This would 
>>>>>>>be my start point, along with recent legislation concerning the misuse 
>>>>>>>of electronic services.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Graham W <graham@nospamgrahamwilson.co.uk> Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well, I've handed 150 of it's more offensive posts to the Old Bill, but 
>>>>>>>doubtless it'll make little difference in the long run. That said, the 
>>>>>>>OB did get rid of the 'Reverand' character on the East Anglia group a 
>>>>>>>few years ago for similar postings. Seems they 'knocked on his door' 
>>>>>>>quite early in the morning and removed computers etc. Here's hoping...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>David Kennedy <davidkennedy@dmnc.NOSPAM.freeserve.co.uk> Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Anything that helps is good. Complaining to Google Groups - or his ISP - 
>>>>>>>seems to be a waste of time and space.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk>  Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, a few people want to see him face due process for something that *you*
>>>>>>>see as trollign and others see as racial hatred and homophobia.
>>>>>>>I don't see reporting someone to the police for hate crimes as 
>>>>>>>"inappropriate". Graham's to be applauded for doing the right thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Kit <kitzyme@yahoo.com> Wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'll give you $25 American for this one.  Provided it's female and
>>>>> doesn't have saggy fried egg titties.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>People who believe that a law may have been breached are entitled to
>>>>>>>bring this fact to the attention of the authorities. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Toby" <tl36265@spamhole.com> Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You'd best be careful with language like that as may well find PC Plod
>>>>>>>on your doorstep wanting to interview you for inciting hatred. And I'll
>>>>>>>be the first to stand up and make a complaint againt you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Bonge Boo! <bingbong@spamcop.net> Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please feel free to do the same. Once we've got that shut down, if he
>>>>>>>continues, I'll just try to get other accounts closed.
>>>>>>>Anyone who has the know-how and inclination to get his ISP to terminate him,
>>>>>>>please feel free to correspond: powerbookboy@gmail.com
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>Why are you posting this in demon.local?
>>> 
>>> The UTB owns demon.local.  We will be using it as our urinal.
>>
>>Wrong--you were consumed the moment you crossed demon.local's doorstep
>>
>>That wasn't a mere lump of lard holding the door open....
> 
> So you're a Modonna fan then.

I'm a Bill Laswell fan.
-- 
ah