🚀 go-pugleaf

Redundant Massacre Rat wrote:
> ah whined:
> 
>>Creepy Pilot wrote:
>>> DLF flushed and announced:
>>> 
>>>>"macfizz@gmail.com" <macfizz@gmail.com> Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I've written to the abuse-meisters at Google Groups quite a few times
>>>>>with no response. You could probably get its ISP to shut the troll's
>>>>>access down, but as it has told us already it can go into a cyber-cafe
>>>>>anywhere and carry on once more. I dare say some folks would like to
>>>>>find the troll's real name and address and go round to discuss the
>>>>>matter human to worm, but part of the nature of this kind of pond-life
>>>>>is its anonymity.
>>>>
>>>>Nigel Eastmond <eastmond.news1@kidneys.mac.com> Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>The CH thing is not even trolling in the sense that I know it. It's 
>>>>>infantile, grossly offensive cross-posting on a level that way 
>>>>>out-offends "Macs suck - discuss." I've actually never seen anything 
>>>>>like this before, and it makes me wonder that if he could be located 
>>>>>then could he actually be prosecuted for libel?
>>>>
>>>>Margolotta <naggingdoubt@thebackofyourmind.invalid> Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Well he must be able to be prosecuted for something. I have resisted 
>>>>>temptation but his remark that everyone with HIV is a 'dirty faggot' got to 
>>>>>me. I know of a bloke with HIV (he sells The Big Issue in Oxford) - he's not 
>>>>>gay - he's a haemophiliac. That's right, he acquired the virus via a blood 
>>>>>transfusion. When the supplier of the blood was contacted, he didn't even 
>>>>>know he was positive - he'd never been tested. 
>>>>>
>>>>>You're right, it's not libellous, but it's surely designed to be provocative? 
>>>>>If it had been said in public, it would be incitement to riot/violence, 
>>>>>surely.
>>>>>
>>>>>There MUST be some law he can be prosecuted under, *surely*?! He can't be 
>>>>>allowed to get away with it. 
>>>>
>>>>Norbert Lieckfeldt <n@lieckfeldt.com> Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>No, because there's a suspicion that he's broken the law. No-one knows 
>>>>>whether he has unless he is being prosecuted by the proper authorities 
>>>>>and convicted by a court of law. But the suspicion that he may have 
>>>>>should be enough to bring it to the attention of prosecuting authorities 
>>>>>who will come to a decision on whether to prosecute or not.
>>>>
>>>>5605 <not@chance.com> Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I refer you all to Section 4a of the Public Order Act 1986. This would 
>>>>>be my start point, along with recent legislation concerning the misuse 
>>>>>of electronic services.
>>>>
>>>>Graham W <graham@nospamgrahamwilson.co.uk> Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Well, I've handed 150 of it's more offensive posts to the Old Bill, but 
>>>>>doubtless it'll make little difference in the long run. That said, the 
>>>>>OB did get rid of the 'Reverand' character on the East Anglia group a 
>>>>>few years ago for similar postings. Seems they 'knocked on his door' 
>>>>>quite early in the morning and removed computers etc. Here's hoping...
>>>>
>>>>David Kennedy <davidkennedy@dmnc.NOSPAM.freeserve.co.uk> Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Anything that helps is good. Complaining to Google Groups - or his ISP - 
>>>>>seems to be a waste of time and space.
>>>>
>>>>Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk>  Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>No, a few people want to see him face due process for something that *you*
>>>>>see as trollign and others see as racial hatred and homophobia.
>>>>>I don't see reporting someone to the police for hate crimes as 
>>>>>"inappropriate". Graham's to be applauded for doing the right thing.
>>>>
>>>>Kit <kitzyme@yahoo.com> Wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'll give you $25 American for this one.  Provided it's female and
>>> doesn't have saggy fried egg titties.
>>> 
>>>>
>>>>>People who believe that a law may have been breached are entitled to
>>>>>bring this fact to the attention of the authorities. 
>>>>
>>>>"Toby" <tl36265@spamhole.com> Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>You'd best be careful with language like that as may well find PC Plod
>>>>>on your doorstep wanting to interview you for inciting hatred. And I'll
>>>>>be the first to stand up and make a complaint againt you.
>>>>
>>>>Bonge Boo! <bingbong@spamcop.net> Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Please feel free to do the same. Once we've got that shut down, if he
>>>>>continues, I'll just try to get other accounts closed.
>>>>>Anyone who has the know-how and inclination to get his ISP to terminate him,
>>>>>please feel free to correspond: powerbookboy@gmail.com
>>> 
>>
>>Why are you posting this in demon.local?
> 
> The UTB owns demon.local.  We will be using it as our urinal.

Wrong--you were consumed the moment you crossed demon.local's doorstep

That wasn't a mere lump of lard holding the door open....
-- 
ah