🚀 go-pugleaf

ah whined:

>Redundant Massacre Rat wrote:
>> ah whined:
>> 
>>>Creepy Pilot wrote:
>>>> DLF flushed and announced:
>>>> 
>>>>>"macfizz@gmail.com" <macfizz@gmail.com> Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I've written to the abuse-meisters at Google Groups quite a few times
>>>>>>with no response. You could probably get its ISP to shut the troll's
>>>>>>access down, but as it has told us already it can go into a cyber-cafe
>>>>>>anywhere and carry on once more. I dare say some folks would like to
>>>>>>find the troll's real name and address and go round to discuss the
>>>>>>matter human to worm, but part of the nature of this kind of pond-life
>>>>>>is its anonymity.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nigel Eastmond <eastmond.news1@kidneys.mac.com> Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>The CH thing is not even trolling in the sense that I know it. It's 
>>>>>>infantile, grossly offensive cross-posting on a level that way 
>>>>>>out-offends "Macs suck - discuss." I've actually never seen anything 
>>>>>>like this before, and it makes me wonder that if he could be located 
>>>>>>then could he actually be prosecuted for libel?
>>>>>
>>>>>Margolotta <naggingdoubt@thebackofyourmind.invalid> Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Well he must be able to be prosecuted for something. I have resisted 
>>>>>>temptation but his remark that everyone with HIV is a 'dirty faggot' got to 
>>>>>>me. I know of a bloke with HIV (he sells The Big Issue in Oxford) - he's not 
>>>>>>gay - he's a haemophiliac. That's right, he acquired the virus via a blood 
>>>>>>transfusion. When the supplier of the blood was contacted, he didn't even 
>>>>>>know he was positive - he'd never been tested. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're right, it's not libellous, but it's surely designed to be provocative? 
>>>>>>If it had been said in public, it would be incitement to riot/violence, 
>>>>>>surely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There MUST be some law he can be prosecuted under, *surely*?! He can't be 
>>>>>>allowed to get away with it. 
>>>>>
>>>>>Norbert Lieckfeldt <n@lieckfeldt.com> Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>No, because there's a suspicion that he's broken the law. No-one knows 
>>>>>>whether he has unless he is being prosecuted by the proper authorities 
>>>>>>and convicted by a court of law. But the suspicion that he may have 
>>>>>>should be enough to bring it to the attention of prosecuting authorities 
>>>>>>who will come to a decision on whether to prosecute or not.
>>>>>
>>>>>5605 <not@chance.com> Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I refer you all to Section 4a of the Public Order Act 1986. This would 
>>>>>>be my start point, along with recent legislation concerning the misuse 
>>>>>>of electronic services.
>>>>>
>>>>>Graham W <graham@nospamgrahamwilson.co.uk> Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Well, I've handed 150 of it's more offensive posts to the Old Bill, but 
>>>>>>doubtless it'll make little difference in the long run. That said, the 
>>>>>>OB did get rid of the 'Reverand' character on the East Anglia group a 
>>>>>>few years ago for similar postings. Seems they 'knocked on his door' 
>>>>>>quite early in the morning and removed computers etc. Here's hoping...
>>>>>
>>>>>David Kennedy <davidkennedy@dmnc.NOSPAM.freeserve.co.uk> Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Anything that helps is good. Complaining to Google Groups - or his ISP - 
>>>>>>seems to be a waste of time and space.
>>>>>
>>>>>Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk>  Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>No, a few people want to see him face due process for something that *you*
>>>>>>see as trollign and others see as racial hatred and homophobia.
>>>>>>I don't see reporting someone to the police for hate crimes as 
>>>>>>"inappropriate". Graham's to be applauded for doing the right thing.
>>>>>
>>>>>Kit <kitzyme@yahoo.com> Wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I'll give you $25 American for this one.  Provided it's female and
>>>> doesn't have saggy fried egg titties.
>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>>>People who believe that a law may have been breached are entitled to
>>>>>>bring this fact to the attention of the authorities. 
>>>>>
>>>>>"Toby" <tl36265@spamhole.com> Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You'd best be careful with language like that as may well find PC Plod
>>>>>>on your doorstep wanting to interview you for inciting hatred. And I'll
>>>>>>be the first to stand up and make a complaint againt you.
>>>>>
>>>>>Bonge Boo! <bingbong@spamcop.net> Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Please feel free to do the same. Once we've got that shut down, if he
>>>>>>continues, I'll just try to get other accounts closed.
>>>>>>Anyone who has the know-how and inclination to get his ISP to terminate him,
>>>>>>please feel free to correspond: powerbookboy@gmail.com
>>>> 
>>>
>>>Why are you posting this in demon.local?
>> 
>> The UTB owns demon.local.  We will be using it as our urinal.
>
>Wrong--you were consumed the moment you crossed demon.local's doorstep
>
>That wasn't a mere lump of lard holding the door open....

So you're a Modonna fan then.

/wooooooooooooooosh!

;)