🚀 go-pugleaf

ah whined:

>Creepy Pilot wrote:
>> DLF flushed and announced:
>> 
>>>"macfizz@gmail.com" <macfizz@gmail.com> Wrote:
>>>
>>>>I've written to the abuse-meisters at Google Groups quite a few times
>>>>with no response. You could probably get its ISP to shut the troll's
>>>>access down, but as it has told us already it can go into a cyber-cafe
>>>>anywhere and carry on once more. I dare say some folks would like to
>>>>find the troll's real name and address and go round to discuss the
>>>>matter human to worm, but part of the nature of this kind of pond-life
>>>>is its anonymity.
>>>
>>>Nigel Eastmond <eastmond.news1@kidneys.mac.com> Wrote:
>>>
>>>>The CH thing is not even trolling in the sense that I know it. It's 
>>>>infantile, grossly offensive cross-posting on a level that way 
>>>>out-offends "Macs suck - discuss." I've actually never seen anything 
>>>>like this before, and it makes me wonder that if he could be located 
>>>>then could he actually be prosecuted for libel?
>>>
>>>Margolotta <naggingdoubt@thebackofyourmind.invalid> Wrote:
>>>
>>>>Well he must be able to be prosecuted for something. I have resisted 
>>>>temptation but his remark that everyone with HIV is a 'dirty faggot' got to 
>>>>me. I know of a bloke with HIV (he sells The Big Issue in Oxford) - he's not 
>>>>gay - he's a haemophiliac. That's right, he acquired the virus via a blood 
>>>>transfusion. When the supplier of the blood was contacted, he didn't even 
>>>>know he was positive - he'd never been tested. 
>>>>
>>>>You're right, it's not libellous, but it's surely designed to be provocative? 
>>>>If it had been said in public, it would be incitement to riot/violence, 
>>>>surely.
>>>>
>>>>There MUST be some law he can be prosecuted under, *surely*?! He can't be 
>>>>allowed to get away with it. 
>>>
>>>Norbert Lieckfeldt <n@lieckfeldt.com> Wrote:
>>>
>>>>No, because there's a suspicion that he's broken the law. No-one knows 
>>>>whether he has unless he is being prosecuted by the proper authorities 
>>>>and convicted by a court of law. But the suspicion that he may have 
>>>>should be enough to bring it to the attention of prosecuting authorities 
>>>>who will come to a decision on whether to prosecute or not.
>>>
>>>5605 <not@chance.com> Wrote:
>>>
>>>>I refer you all to Section 4a of the Public Order Act 1986. This would 
>>>>be my start point, along with recent legislation concerning the misuse 
>>>>of electronic services.
>>>
>>>Graham W <graham@nospamgrahamwilson.co.uk> Wrote:
>>>
>>>>Well, I've handed 150 of it's more offensive posts to the Old Bill, but 
>>>>doubtless it'll make little difference in the long run. That said, the 
>>>>OB did get rid of the 'Reverand' character on the East Anglia group a 
>>>>few years ago for similar postings. Seems they 'knocked on his door' 
>>>>quite early in the morning and removed computers etc. Here's hoping...
>>>
>>>David Kennedy <davidkennedy@dmnc.NOSPAM.freeserve.co.uk> Wrote:
>>>
>>>>Anything that helps is good. Complaining to Google Groups - or his ISP - 
>>>>seems to be a waste of time and space.
>>>
>>>Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk>  Wrote:
>>>
>>>>No, a few people want to see him face due process for something that *you*
>>>>see as trollign and others see as racial hatred and homophobia.
>>>>I don't see reporting someone to the police for hate crimes as 
>>>>"inappropriate". Graham's to be applauded for doing the right thing.
>>>
>>>Kit <kitzyme@yahoo.com> Wrote:
>> 
>> I'll give you $25 American for this one.  Provided it's female and
>> doesn't have saggy fried egg titties.
>> 
>>>
>>>>People who believe that a law may have been breached are entitled to
>>>>bring this fact to the attention of the authorities. 
>>>
>>>"Toby" <tl36265@spamhole.com> Wrote:
>>>
>>>>You'd best be careful with language like that as may well find PC Plod
>>>>on your doorstep wanting to interview you for inciting hatred. And I'll
>>>>be the first to stand up and make a complaint againt you.
>>>
>>>Bonge Boo! <bingbong@spamcop.net> Wrote:
>>>
>>>>Please feel free to do the same. Once we've got that shut down, if he
>>>>continues, I'll just try to get other accounts closed.
>>>>Anyone who has the know-how and inclination to get his ISP to terminate him,
>>>>please feel free to correspond: powerbookboy@gmail.com
>> 
>
>Why are you posting this in demon.local?

The UTB owns demon.local.  We will be using it as our urinal.