🚀 go-pugleaf

"Dave" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message 
news:1095148503.6592.0@nnrp-t71-02.news.clara.net...
>
> "Conor" <conor.turton@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1bb06cd0ed5ce0a4989758@news.giganews.com...
>> In article <2qmpc0F119m7bU1@uni-berlin.de>, Bob J says...
>> >
>> > "Conor" <conor.turton@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:MPG.1bb026bfd5de558098974f@news.giganews.com...
>> > > In article <ci4v4k$dug$1@hercules.btinternet.com>, TooFatToSurf
> says...
>> >
>> > > Non at all. THey can't supply what they don't have. THey've refunded
>> > > you so you've not lost out. I think you'll find a E&OE statement
> hidden
>> > > somewhere.
>> >
>> > By debiting his card they almost certainly entered into a contract to
> supply
>> > the goods at the price stated (and taken). The fact that they didn't
> have
>> > the goods and refunded the money is irrelevant.
>> >
>> > I suggest that the OP (and you Conor) does a search for "loss of
> bargain".
>> > Ok, the fact that the goods were second hand may change things but
> certainly
>> > if they were new the OP would have a very good case.
>> >
>> I suggest you go and read up about E & OE.
>>
>
> what does e&oe stand for.  Always wondered this
>

Dave you once post a section of Claranets AUP here it was this section!

11) The customer must not send email or post articles with headers modified 
in such a way as to disguise the true source of such mail or article. It is 
the customer's responsibilty to ensure that a real email address is present 
and obvious to a human.

Your headers look like they've been altered to me!

No you're not a hypocrite are you.