🚀 go-pugleaf

" Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote in message 
news:4147150f$0$20246$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
>
> "Dave" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message 
> news:1095148503.6592.0@nnrp-t71-02.news.clara.net...
>>
>> "Conor" <conor.turton@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.1bb06cd0ed5ce0a4989758@news.giganews.com...
>>> In article <2qmpc0F119m7bU1@uni-berlin.de>, Bob J says...
>>> >
>>> > "Conor" <conor.turton@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:MPG.1bb026bfd5de558098974f@news.giganews.com...
>>> > > In article <ci4v4k$dug$1@hercules.btinternet.com>, TooFatToSurf
>> says...
>>> >
>>> > > Non at all. THey can't supply what they don't have. THey've refunded
>>> > > you so you've not lost out. I think you'll find a E&OE statement
>> hidden
>>> > > somewhere.
>>> >
>>> > By debiting his card they almost certainly entered into a contract to
>> supply
>>> > the goods at the price stated (and taken). The fact that they didn't
>> have
>>> > the goods and refunded the money is irrelevant.
>>> >
>>> > I suggest that the OP (and you Conor) does a search for "loss of
>> bargain".
>>> > Ok, the fact that the goods were second hand may change things but
>> certainly
>>> > if they were new the OP would have a very good case.
>>> >
>>> I suggest you go and read up about E & OE.
>>>
>>
>> what does e&oe stand for.  Always wondered this
>>
>
> Dave you once post a section of Claranets AUP here it was this section!
>
> 11) The customer must not send email or post articles with headers 
> modified in such a way as to disguise the true source of such mail or 
> article. It is the customer's responsibilty to ensure that a real email 
> address is present and obvious to a human.
>
> Your headers look like they've been altered to me!
>
> No you're not a hypocrite are you.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?M31923A49