🚀 go-pugleaf

"Mike" <du@b> wrote in message
news:37lg1v85g7cqohhu3i6ciiqi5v7fnqo45l@news.clara.net...
> Grant, wrote...
>
> >"Mike" <du@b> wrote in message
> >
> >Mike most people that use and have an interest and care about Usenet look
> >down on Netcops as probably the lowest form of user.
>
> The term "Netcop" covers a wide variety of creatures, from utter
> saddo 'Mary Whitehouse' types to newbies simply defending
> themselves. This is why your attempted pedantic use of the term
> is so fucked, you pillock.

No i'm not being pedantic. We are talking about a specific example here and
a pathetic one at that. You said yourself Chris jumped the gun.

> >Netcopping does have
> >its place however you yourself have mentioned a few examples. Chris
Buckley
> >and myself have had people go to far in what they have said and done. And
I'
> >m not ashamed to admit I've reported individuals on more that one
occasion.
>
> Which makes you a hypocrite, fuckhead.

No because i've never denied it. And the reasons have always been far from
frivolous

> >You originally defended Chris saying that he has only ever reported when
> >flamed to the extreme (Flaming is never an acceptable reason for
netcopping)
> >or when people go too far much too far. See you quotes below.
>
> That's *not* what I said at all YTC.. I said fuck all about
> "extreme flaming". And by "when people go too far much too far",
> I clearly meant actions which may have RL repercussions.

It was a C&P of your post, you said it.
>
> See *your* copy of *my* quotes below...
>
> >"He only ever did that when people got personal and took Usenet
> >banter to RL. *Anyone* who takes this shit to RL deserves what
> >they get and a good netcopping is the least of what I'd do to
> >anyone who threatened the welfare of me or *my* family."
> >
> >"And you know that CB isn't a netcop per se, you know that he's
> >only ever resorted to abuse@ when people go too far, much too
> >far."
> >
> >You have even conceded that in the case of Mike H that Chris did act
> >hastily.
>
> >"Perhaps he did jump a bit too quick.. But I don't think either of
> >you should let this become an issue now, I know Chris bears no
> >grudge and prolly hopes you don't either."
>
> One fucking example at a time when Chris was being hit by every
> saddo opportunist wannabe meower there's ever been?..  Oh
> purleeeease do fuck off.

Er not around here he wasnt.
>
> >Now i know he's a friend and you are loyal that's a commendable quality
but
> >when you allow that friendship to totally cloud your objectivity that
shows
> >a weakness in your character. Chris frivolusly reported Mike H that's a
> >fact. You should just shut the fuck up. No amount of post can change that
> >FACT.
>
> You still seem to be under some sad delusion that I give a flying
> fuck. Next time you go trolling about up ^^ there in some
> desperate attempt to make a case for yourself, you should read
> this again...

you keep replying that says it all.
>
>   <paste>
>
> >> And whom, exactly, do you imagine, gives even the tiniest measure
> >> of flying fuckedness about what you think?
> >
> >You do! if you didn't you wouldn't have asked these questions.
>
> Let's get this straight.. You, seriously believe that I care
> about what you think, right?
>
>
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
>
>   </paste>
>
> And I'm quite happy with my "character" you tosser.
>
> >Chris has said it was a serious matter but you don't quite see it that
way
> >do you?
>
> wtf *are* you babbling about now you thick cunt? It's you that
> can't fucking see straight. Look it's simple..
>
> 1999/2000 and Chris (18 years old and from a very respectable
> familiy about which he cares *lots*) is facing a serious court
> case. People on usenet seize the opportunity to take the piss,
> some are perhaps justified as Chris has pelted them in the past,
> some are not. Many start quoting stuff that IN REAL LIFE can
> damage Chris for the REST OF HIS LIFE. All this is now totally
> out of proportion.
>
> So now Chris is a bit paranoid, he tales advice from his counsel
> and then takes steps towards 'damage limitation'. In that flurry
> of utter bollocks which *is* usenet, he makes a few mistakes. He
> stood there for his mistakes, never grassed any of the countless
> others who might have stood by him (thanks Paula) then *luckily,
> case gets dropped.  He lives, and learns and calms down on the
> now quite rare occasions when he bothers with usenet.

Mental illness thats what i suspected. That what Parnoia is!

> And TWO YEARS LATER, after all that and just because he said...
>
> > haha, yeah, read all about that one!
>
> ..the the best you can come up with is..
>
> "Oh do Fuck off you Netcopping miss-aborted wankstain."
>
> Yet now you admit to being a netcop yourself, and in spite of...
>
>       "Organization: I Hate Netcops"  ....
>
> >No doubt you will simply Flame this post (and its spelling mistake
lameO),
> >that's the predictable route or you may try and counter it reasonable
that
> >would be refreshing, but you can't change what you have already said. You
> >may ignore it which will simply be confirming that what I've said is
true!
> >
> >
> >
> >What's it to be?
>
> Go fuck yourself you babbling wanker.
>
> >Get a Friend to reply?

You do lack objectivity don't you. Oxygen deprivation?