🚀 go-pugleaf

*But none of our partnerships is more vital than our "new quality"
relationship with Russia.  We have developed a real spirit of trust and
cooperation, which is reflected in regular and frank political dialogue.  We
have also developed a broad programme of practical cooperation in areas as
diverse as theatre missile defence, peacekeeping, and search and rescue at
sea.  And the expansion of our military-to-military cooperation has been
truly spectacular -- from 7 joint exercises and events in 2002, to a planned
57 this year.

At the same time, common cause in the fight against terrorism remains at the
core of our new relationship.

Since last week, NATO - and the NATO-Russia Council - have seven new
members.  The security coalition between NATO and Russia has been
strengthened -- and so has our ability to address common challenges, and to
promote positive change.  One critical priority before us is to make our
joint efforts in the fight against terrorism as coherent and effective as
they can be.  We look to you to provide fresh ideas and initiative in
carrying this work forward.

---

Location: http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2004/s040405a.htm

Keynote Address
by NATO Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer
at the NATO Russia Council (NRC) conference
on the role of the military in combating terrorism

Norfolk, Virginia, USA
Monday, 5 April 2004

Excellencies,
Generals,
Admirals,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

              This is the third NATO-Russia conference on the role of the
military in combating terrorism - and yet again it takes place in the shadow
of a great tragedy.  The first meeting took place just a few months after
terrorists attacked New York and Washington.  The second not long after the
hostage taking in Moscow's Dubrovka Street.  And we are meeting today just
weeks after the devastating bomb attacks in the centre of Madrid.

              In New York, Washington, Moscow, Istanbul and Madrid - but
also in Bali, Casablanca, Riyadh or lately in Tashkent - a new breed of
terrorism has shown its true face. A breed of terrorism which harbours no
clearly identifiable political grievance;  which tolerates no argument;
which respects no national boundaries, political systems, ideologies or
religions;  and which threatens all of us -- everywhere, and every day.

              Because this new breed of terrorism sets itself no
limitations, our response to it must be equally determined and
comprehensive -- or we are sure to fail.  Fighting this menace effectively
requires the fullest possible international cooperation, especially in
sharing intelligence, law enforcement, border security and the tracking of
terrorist finances.  But the military, too, has a role to play, for a
variety of reasons.

            First, because terrorist groups like Al-Qaida operate at an
ever-higher level in the spectrum of violence, blurring the distinction
between terrorism and warfare.  Second, because the difference between
internal and external security is also fading, and the military may have to
deal with challenges that police forces are simply unable to handle.  And
third, because it will sometimes be impossible to deal with terrorist
threats using defensive measures only.

              If the military has a role to play in fighting this new kind
of terrorism, so must NATO as the world's most effective military alliance.
And we have started to rise to this challenge.

              At our Prague Summit, in November 2002, NATO recognised
terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, and "failed states" as the defining
security challenges of this new century.  And we decided to send our forces
to wherever they are needed to meet these challenges.

              Last year, the Alliance acted upon that decision by taking
charge of the
UN-mandated International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan.  Today,
we are fully engaged in spreading security and stability in that war-torn
country, helping the Government to extend its authority, and assisting other
international actors to contribute in their own way.

              Last month, in the Mediterranean, NATO's successful maritime
operation, Operation Active Endeavour, has been expended to cover the entire
Mediterranean sea.

              But, in Prague, we also embarked upon a comprehensive
programme of military transformation to meet the new threats, and to defeat
them. Today, that transformation is well underway.

              We are implementing a leaner command structure, in which
Alliance Command Transformation here in Norfolk occupies a central role.
Our NATO Response Force has been stood up, and it is on course to achieve
full operational capability by
October 2006.

                 We have also made major advances in protecting ourselves
against Weapons of Mass Destruction, including through the launch of a
special CBRN defence battalion last year.  And both individual Alliance
members and several groups of Allies are developing the kind of modern
capabilities we need to face the new threats together. And as recently, as
last Friday, Ministers of Foreign Affairs agreed on the need to go even
further and to develop an enhanced package of measures on the fight against
terrorism by Istanbul.

              The new NATO is tackling today's threats head-on, well away
from its traditional area of operations.  It is an Alliance determined to
modernise its structures and capabilities - in order to be able to make a
meaningful and sustained contribution to what is bound to be a long and
difficult struggle.

              But the Alliance also recognises that any effective response
to the terrorist threat needs to be broad-based and inclusive. As our
geographic horizons have broadened, we have deepened our relations with
other major organisations like the UN, the EU and the OSCE. We have reached
out to our Partners in the Balkans, the Caucasus and Central Asia; and
intensified our dialogue with countries in the Mediterranean region.

              But none of our partnerships is more vital than our "new
quality" relationship with Russia.  We have developed a real spirit of trust
and cooperation, which is reflected in regular and frank political dialogue.
We have also developed a broad programme of practical cooperation in areas
as diverse as theatre missile defence, peacekeeping, and search and rescue
at sea.  And the expansion of our military-to-military cooperation has been
truly spectacular -- from 7 joint exercises and events in 2002, to a planned
57 this year.

              At the same time, common cause in the fight against terrorism
remains at the core of our new relationship.  The NATO-Russia Council has
agreed on intelligence assessments of various aspects of the problem.  And
we are examining closer cooperation in airspace management to prevent
terrorist threats to civil aviation.

              Our scientists have pooled their efforts in areas such as
explosives detection, the secure decommissioning of nuclear submarines,
cyber-security, and the psychological and social causes, effects and
responses to terrorism. We have tested and enhanced our capabilities to
manage the consequences of terrorist attacks, with the large scale exercise
that Russia hosted in Noginsk in 2002, and another planned in Kaliningrad
this coming June.

              All this is good progress -- and it is welcome progress.  But
I believe it is not nearly enough -- given the seriousness of the challenge
before us, and the resources, skills and experience that we possess.

              The lethal new breed of terrorism we face today calls for
realism, and for concrete action.  At the moment, national sovereignty and
security requirements often complicate multinational responses to acute
crisis situations, and that is not going to change overnight.  But surely
there is scope for more effective cooperation to prepare for and deal with
problems that are longer-term and larger-scale.  We should explore that
scope more urgently, including here today.

              I also believe that we should be much more practical about
cooperation in the fight against terrorism.  I used to be diplomat and then
a politician - so you would expect me to defend the merits of dialogue, and
I will.  But I also know that, at the end of the day, what really matters
are deeds, not words.  And so the focus of today's meeting should be on
enhancing cooperation where it really matters - which is in the field.

              Speaking about cooperation where it matters, Afghanistan and
the wider region around it must be a key concern to Russia as well as to
NATO.  In the NRC we have conducted regular and detailed consultations on
the situation in Afghanistan.  I hope that we can make progress soon on
Russia's offers of assistance to ISAF.  And I am heartened by Russia's
interest in engaging with the Alliance on the challenges and opportunities
in this broader geographic region, and what we in the NATO-Russia Council
can contribute to meet them.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

              Since last week, NATO - and the NATO-Russia Council - have
seven new members.  The security coalition between NATO and Russia has been
strengthened -- and so has our ability to address common challenges, and to
promote positive change.  One critical priority before us is to make our
joint efforts in the fight against terrorism as coherent and effective as
they can be.  We look to you to provide fresh ideas and initiative in
carrying this work forward.

              Thank you.