Article View: uk.education.maths
Article #103Re: Pi day
From: Martin Ward
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 00:00
50 lines
3158 bytes
3158 bytes
In article <33375C6B.167EB0E7@owlnet.rice.edu>, Robert James Aguirre <robba@owlnet.rice.edu> writes >Martin Ward wrote: > > >> I was referring to real numbers (like pi - see the subject line) so >> Jaime's crticism is valid. I presume Ulrich was thinking of the natural >> numbers, or possibly the rationals, or possibly rationals of the form >> a/b where a,b are natural numbers with a<=31 and b<=12. Any of these >> sets can be well-ordered, and then Ulrich's argument "works" as Katy >> says. >> >> I like this argument, but of course it has a more subtle flaw... >> -- > >Hmm I suppose the reals "can" be well ordered as well (or must I leave >choice axioms alone... Yes, you are right, given the Axiom of Choice any set can be well- ordered. However, we cannot assume that the "smallest" element in the reals under an arbitrarily chosen well-ordering will be interesting, since this is tantamount to assuming that every real is interesting. (Given a well ordering of the reals we can easily construct another with any desired smallest element). Petitio principii. This also applies to the rationals, of course - I was sloppy there, it is too long since I really thought about this sort of thing. However, the natural numbers are well-ordered by the usual order <, and 1 is interesting - this is what Ulrich's argument refers to - and the rationals can be well-ordered by a bijection with the natural numbers which maps interesting rationals on to 1,2,... and it is that that I was thinking about above. The reals cannot be well-ordered in any such simple way. -- Martin Ward _________________________________________________________________________ "When *I* use a word", Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less". "The question is", said Alice, "whether you *can* make words mean so many different things". "The question is", said Humpty-Dumpty, "which is to be master - that's all". "Through the Looking-Glass" - Lewis Carroll. _________________________________________________________________________ Turnpike evaluation. For information, see http://www.turnpike.com/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gxRZ6IADfvOzEwTF@ward-hull.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8WRuzAAXBILzEwKP@ward-hull.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f458d,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf458d,public X-Google-Thread: 1130d6,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gid1130d6,public X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gid109d8a,public X-Google-Thread: 10d67e,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d67e,public X-Google-Thread: 1077c2,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gid1077c2,public X-Google-Thread: f7972,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf7972,public From: Martin Ward <martin@ward-hull.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Pi day Date: 1997/03/27 Message-ID: <gxRZ6IADfvOzEwTF@ward-hull.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 228874714 Distribution: world X-NNTP-Posting-Host: ward-hull.demon.co.uk References: <8WRuzAAXBILzEwKP@ward-hull.demon.co.uk> Organization: . Newsgroups: uk.education.maths,alt.uu.math.misc,aus.mathematics,can.schoolnet.math.sr,alt.math.recreational,sci.math