🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: uk.education.maths
Article #103

Re: Pi day

#103
From: Martin Ward
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 00:00
50 lines
3158 bytes
In article <33375C6B.167EB0E7@owlnet.rice.edu>, Robert James Aguirre
<robba@owlnet.rice.edu> writes
>Martin Ward wrote:
>
> 
>> I was referring to real numbers (like pi - see the subject line) so
>> Jaime's crticism is valid.  I presume Ulrich was thinking of the natural
>> numbers, or possibly the rationals, or possibly rationals of the form
>> a/b where a,b are natural numbers with a<=31 and b<=12.  Any of these
>> sets can be well-ordered, and then Ulrich's argument "works" as Katy
>> says.
>> 
>> I like this argument, but of course it has a more subtle flaw...
>> --
>
>Hmm  I suppose the reals "can" be well ordered as well (or must I leave
>choice axioms alone...

Yes, you are right, given the Axiom of Choice any set can be well-
ordered.  However, we cannot assume that the "smallest" element in the
reals under an arbitrarily chosen well-ordering will be interesting,
since this is tantamount to assuming that every real is interesting.
(Given a well ordering of the reals we can easily construct another with
any desired smallest element).  Petitio principii.

This also applies to the rationals, of course - I was sloppy there, it
is too long since I really thought about this sort of thing.  However,
the natural numbers are well-ordered by the usual order <, and 1 is
interesting - this is what Ulrich's argument refers to - and the
rationals can be well-ordered by a bijection with the natural numbers
which maps interesting rationals on to 1,2,... and it is that that I was
thinking about above.  The reals cannot be well-ordered in any such
simple way.
-- 

Martin Ward

_________________________________________________________________________

"When *I* use a word", Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it
 means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less".
"The question is", said Alice, "whether you *can* make words mean so many
 different things".
"The question is", said Humpty-Dumpty, "which is to be master - that's all".

"Through the Looking-Glass" - Lewis Carroll.
_________________________________________________________________________

Turnpike evaluation. For information, see http://www.turnpike.com/
Technical Details
Message-ID: <gxRZ6IADfvOzEwTF@ward-hull.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <8WRuzAAXBILzEwKP@ward-hull.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f458d,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf458d,public
X-Google-Thread: 1130d6,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid1130d6,public
X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid109d8a,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d67e,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d67e,public
X-Google-Thread: 1077c2,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid1077c2,public
X-Google-Thread: f7972,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7972,public
From: Martin Ward <martin@ward-hull.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Pi day
Date: 1997/03/27
Message-ID: <gxRZ6IADfvOzEwTF@ward-hull.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 228874714
Distribution: world
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: ward-hull.demon.co.uk
References: <8WRuzAAXBILzEwKP@ward-hull.demon.co.uk>
Organization: .
Newsgroups: uk.education.maths,alt.uu.math.misc,aus.mathematics,can.schoolnet.math.sr,alt.math.recreational,sci.math